Usage comparison · Tight ends

Nick Muse vs Noah Fant

Noah Fant gets more of his team's passes (9% vs 6%) and more of the deep throws (5% of its air yards vs 1%). Nick Muse has played 1 game and Noah Fant 5 games. Near the end zone, Noah Fant has had more chances (3 vs 1 plays within 20 yards), but Nick Muse gets a bigger share of his team's chances there (9% vs 6%). Nick Muse is scoring more fantasy points a game (8.2 vs 7.5, PPR), but the chances Noah Fant gets usually score more: 5.4 vs 5.2 expected points a game Est..

2026 season · Weeks 1–7 · Updated Oct 27, 2026

TEATL

Nick Muse
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
8.2
Expected points per gameEst.
5.2

1 game with a target, carry or dropback

TENO

Noah Fant
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
7.5
Expected points per gameEst.
5.4

5 games with a target, carry or dropback

Side by side

Season totals through week 7. Shares are of each player's team totals in the games he played. For counts and shares, the bigger number is in bold and the bars grow from the centre line.
Nick Muse and Noah Fant, season usage side by side
StatNick MuseNoah Fant
Games15
Passes thrown to him
Targets216
Target share6%9%
Air-yards share1%5%
Catches211
Receiving yards284
Near the end zone
Red-zone chances13
Red-zone share9%6%
End-zone targets12
Touchdowns
Touchdowns13
Expected touchdownsEst.0.51.0
Fantasy points
Fantasy points per game (PPR)8.27.5
Fantasy points (PPR)8.237.4
Expected points per gameEst.5.25.4
Points vs expectedEst.+3.0+2.0

Week by week

Each bar is one game. Pick a stat to compare.

Target share by week

Out of all the passes his team threw in his games, the part thrown to him.

  • Nick Muse
  • Noah Fant

— no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Target share by week
WeekNick MuseNoah Fant
1— no game with a target, carry or dropback15%against DET
2— no game with a target, carry or dropback— no game with a target, carry or dropback
3— no game with a target, carry or dropback10%against LV
4— no game with a target, carry or dropback— no game with a target, carry or dropback
5— no game with a target, carry or dropback4%against MIN
6— no game with a target, carry or dropback3%against NYG
76%against SF5%against PIT

Next to each number: that week's opponent. — no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Where they rank

Each player's place among players at his position who meet the leaderboard's minimum. Open a leaderboard for the full list.
Leaderboard ranks for Nick Muse and Noah Fant
LeaderboardNick MuseNoah Fant
Target share leadersBelow the minimum (at least 10 targets in at least 2 games)#41of 52 tight ends
Air-yards share leadersBelow the minimum (at least 10 targets in at least 2 games)#41of 52 tight ends
Red-zone share leadersBelow the minimum (at least 3 red-zone opportunities in at least 2 games)#31of 39 tight ends
Red-zone opportunity leaders#75of 109 tight ends#36of 109 tight ends
End-zone target leaders#52of 109 tight ends#27of 109 tight ends
Expected fantasy points leadersEst.#44of 109 tight ends#43of 109 tight ends

Keep exploring