Usage comparison · Tight ends

Colby Parkinson vs Nick Muse

Colby Parkinson gets more of his team's passes (9% vs 6%) and more of the deep throws (2% of its air yards vs 1%). Colby Parkinson has played 6 games and Nick Muse 1 game. Near the end zone, Colby Parkinson has had more chances (5 vs 1 plays within 20 yards), but Nick Muse gets a bigger share of his team's chances there (9% vs 8%). Nick Muse is scoring more fantasy points a game (8.2 vs 5.1, PPR), but the chances Colby Parkinson gets usually score more: 5.5 vs 5.2 expected points a game Est..

2026 season · Weeks 1–7 · Updated Oct 27, 2026

TELA

Colby Parkinson
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
5.1
Expected points per gameEst.
5.5

6 games with a target, carry or dropback

TEATL

Nick Muse
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
8.2
Expected points per gameEst.
5.2

1 game with a target, carry or dropback

Side by side

Season totals through week 7. Shares are of each player's team totals in the games he played. For counts and shares, the bigger number is in bold and the bars grow from the centre line.
Colby Parkinson and Nick Muse, season usage side by side
StatColby ParkinsonNick Muse
Games61
Passes thrown to him
Targets192
Target share9%6%
Air-yards share2%1%
Catches142
Receiving yards1032
Near the end zone
Red-zone chances51
Red-zone share8%9%
End-zone targets01
Touchdowns
Touchdowns11
Expected touchdownsEst.1.40.5
Fantasy points
Fantasy points per game (PPR)5.18.2
Fantasy points (PPR)30.38.2
Expected points per gameEst.5.55.2
Points vs expectedEst.−0.4+3.0

Week by week

Each bar is one game. Pick a stat to compare.

Target share by week

Out of all the passes his team threw in his games, the part thrown to him.

  • Colby Parkinson
  • Nick Muse

— no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Target share by week
WeekColby ParkinsonNick Muse
17%against SF— no game with a target, carry or dropback
27%against NYG— no game with a target, carry or dropback
32%against DEN— no game with a target, carry or dropback
4— no game with a target, carry or dropback— no game with a target, carry or dropback
54%against BUF— no game with a target, carry or dropback
619%against ARI— no game with a target, carry or dropback
721%against LV6%against SF

Next to each number: that week's opponent. — no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Where they rank

Each player's place among players at his position who meet the leaderboard's minimum. Open a leaderboard for the full list.
Leaderboard ranks for Colby Parkinson and Nick Muse
LeaderboardColby ParkinsonNick Muse
Target share leaders#42of 52 tight endsBelow the minimum (at least 10 targets in at least 2 games)
Air-yards share leaders#51of 52 tight endsBelow the minimum (at least 10 targets in at least 2 games)
Red-zone share leaders#26of 39 tight endsBelow the minimum (at least 3 red-zone opportunities in at least 2 games)
Red-zone opportunity leaders#14of 109 tight ends#75of 109 tight ends
End-zone target leaders#70of 109 tight ends#52of 109 tight ends
Expected fantasy points leadersEst.#41of 109 tight ends#44of 109 tight ends

Talking points

Fact-checked notes from the weekly usage report, with the numbers behind them.

Colby Parkinson

Role up

Colby Parkinson's target share rose to 21% in week 7 (6 targets), from 7% in weeks 1-6.

Target share, week 7
21%
Targets, week 7
6
Target share, weeks 1–3 and 5–6
7%
Targets, weeks 1–3 and 5–6
13

Weeks 1–3 and 5–7 · 6 games

  • Share of team targets/carries in games he played. Snap counts aren't in FFO's licensed data, so a low earlier share can mean limited playing time.

Nick Muse

No talking points for him in this week's report.

Keep exploring