Usage comparison · Tight ends
Noah Fant gets more of the deep throws (5% of his team's air yards vs 2%), and they get the same share of their teams' passes (9%). Colby Parkinson has played 6 games and Noah Fant 5 games. Near the end zone, Colby Parkinson has had more chances (5 vs 3 plays within 20 yards) and a bigger share of his team's chances there (8% vs 6%). Noah Fant is scoring more fantasy points a game (7.5 vs 5.1, PPR), but the chances Colby Parkinson gets usually score more: 5.5 vs 5.4 expected points a game Est..
2026 season · Weeks 1–7 · Updated Oct 27, 2026
TELA
Colby Parkinson6 games with a target, carry or dropback
| Stat | Colby Parkinson | Noah Fant |
|---|---|---|
| Games | 6 | 5 |
| Passes thrown to him | ||
| Targets | 19 | 16 |
| Target share | 9% | 9% |
| Air-yards share | 2% | 5% |
| Catches | 14 | 11 |
| Receiving yards | 103 | 84 |
| Near the end zone | ||
| Red-zone chances | 5 | 3 |
| Red-zone share | 8% | 6% |
| End-zone targets | 0 | 2 |
| Touchdowns | ||
| Touchdowns | 1 | 3 |
| Expected touchdownsEst. | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| Fantasy points | ||
| Fantasy points per game (PPR) | 5.1 | 7.5 |
| Fantasy points (PPR) | 30.3 | 37.4 |
| Expected points per gameEst. | 5.5 | 5.4 |
| Points vs expectedEst. | −0.4 | +2.0 |
Target share by week
Out of all the passes his team threw in his games, the part thrown to him.
— no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.
| Week | Colby Parkinson | Noah Fant |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7%against SF | 15%against DET |
| 2 | 7%against NYG | — no game with a target, carry or dropback |
| 3 | 2%against DEN | 10%against LV |
| 4 | — no game with a target, carry or dropback | — no game with a target, carry or dropback |
| 5 | 4%against BUF | 4%against MIN |
| 6 | 19%against ARI | 3%against NYG |
| 7 | 21%against LV | 5%against PIT |
Next to each number: that week's opponent. — no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.
| Leaderboard | Colby Parkinson | Noah Fant |
|---|---|---|
| Target share leaders | #42of 52 tight ends | #41of 52 tight ends |
| Air-yards share leaders | #51of 52 tight ends | #41of 52 tight ends |
| Red-zone share leaders | #26of 39 tight ends | #31of 39 tight ends |
| Red-zone opportunity leaders | #14of 109 tight ends | #36of 109 tight ends |
| End-zone target leaders | #70of 109 tight ends | #27of 109 tight ends |
| Expected fantasy points leadersEst. | #41of 109 tight ends | #43of 109 tight ends |
Role up
Weeks 1–3 and 5–7 · 6 games
No talking points for him in this week's report.
Colby Parkinson
More comparisons
Noah Fant
More comparisons