Usage comparison · Tight ends

Evan Engram vs Nick Muse

Evan Engram gets more of his team's passes (11% vs 6%) and more of the deep throws (10% of its air yards vs 1%). Evan Engram has played 7 games and Nick Muse 1 game. Near the end zone, Evan Engram has had more chances (2 vs 1 plays within 20 yards), but Nick Muse gets a bigger share of his team's chances there (9% vs 4%). Nick Muse is scoring more fantasy points a game (8.2 vs 4.7, PPR), and his chances usually score more too: 5.2 vs 5.1 expected points a game Est..

2026 season · Weeks 1–7 · Updated Oct 27, 2026

TEDEN

Evan Engram
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
4.7
Expected points per gameEst.
5.1

7 games with a target, carry or dropback

TEATL

Nick Muse
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
8.2
Expected points per gameEst.
5.2

1 game with a target, carry or dropback

Side by side

Season totals through week 7. Shares are of each player's team totals in the games he played. For counts and shares, the bigger number is in bold and the bars grow from the centre line.
Evan Engram and Nick Muse, season usage side by side
StatEvan EngramNick Muse
Games71
Passes thrown to him
Targets222
Target share11%6%
Air-yards share10%1%
Catches132
Receiving yards1362
Near the end zone
Red-zone chances21
Red-zone share4%9%
End-zone targets11
Touchdowns
Touchdowns11
Expected touchdownsEst.0.80.5
Fantasy points
Fantasy points per game (PPR)4.78.2
Fantasy points (PPR)32.68.2
Expected points per gameEst.5.15.2
Points vs expectedEst.−0.5+3.0

Week by week

Each bar is one game. Pick a stat to compare.

Target share by week

Out of all the passes his team threw in his games, the part thrown to him.

  • Evan Engram
  • Nick Muse

— no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Target share by week
WeekEvan EngramNick Muse
119%against KC— no game with a target, carry or dropback
23%against JAX— no game with a target, carry or dropback
36%against LA— no game with a target, carry or dropback
413%against SF— no game with a target, carry or dropback
518%against LAC— no game with a target, carry or dropback
68%against SEA— no game with a target, carry or dropback
712%against ARI6%against SF

Next to each number: that week's opponent. — no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Where they rank

Each player's place among players at his position who meet the leaderboard's minimum. Open a leaderboard for the full list.
Leaderboard ranks for Evan Engram and Nick Muse
LeaderboardEvan EngramNick Muse
Target share leaders#32of 52 tight endsBelow the minimum (at least 10 targets in at least 2 games)
Air-yards share leaders#27of 52 tight endsBelow the minimum (at least 10 targets in at least 2 games)
Red-zone share leadersBelow the minimum (at least 3 red-zone opportunities in at least 2 games)Below the minimum (at least 3 red-zone opportunities in at least 2 games)
Red-zone opportunity leaders#44of 109 tight ends#75of 109 tight ends
End-zone target leaders#40of 109 tight ends#52of 109 tight ends
Expected fantasy points leadersEst.#45of 109 tight ends#44of 109 tight ends

Keep exploring