QB efficiency
Lamar Jackson is at +0.36 EPA per dropback over 103 dropbacks, 2nd of 40 QBs with 50+.
- EPA rank
- 2 of 40 qualified QBs
- EPA per dropback
- +0.36
- Dropbacks
- 103
Weeks 1–4 · 4 games
Usage comparison · Quarterbacks
Lamar Jackson vs Tanner McKee
Lamar Jackson has had more pass plays (103 vs 85) and more runs (19 vs 2). Lamar Jackson has played 4 games and Tanner McKee 2 games. Lamar Jackson is scoring more fantasy points a game (19.8 vs 11.6, PPR), and his chances usually score more too: 14.3 vs 14.0 expected points a game Est..
2026 season · Weeks 1–7 · Updated Oct 27, 2026
QBBAL
Lamar Jackson- Fantasy points per game (PPR)
- 19.8
- Expected points per gameEst.
- 14.3
4 games with a target, carry or dropback
Week 7 injury report: Out (Ankle)
QBPHI
Tanner McKee- Fantasy points per game (PPR)
- 11.6
- Expected points per gameEst.
- 14.0
2 games with a target, carry or dropback
Side by side
Season totals through week 7. Shares are of each player's team totals in the games he played. For counts and shares, the bigger number is in bold and the bars grow from the centre line.
| Stat | Lamar Jackson | Tanner McKee |
|---|---|---|
| Games | 4 | 2 |
| Pass plays | ||
| Dropbacks | 103 | 85 |
| Pass attempts | 96 | 80 |
| Completions | 68 | 49 |
| Passing yards | 967 | 426 |
| Passing touchdowns | 6 | 2 |
| Interceptions | 1 | 1 |
| EPA per dropback | +0.36 | −0.14 |
| CPOE (accuracy) | +8.1 | −4.6 |
| Runs | ||
| Carries | 19 | 2 |
| Rushing yards | 144 | 1 |
| Near the end zone | ||
| Red-zone chances | 5 | 0 |
| Goal-line runs | 2 | 0 |
| Touchdowns | ||
| Touchdowns | 1 | 0 |
| Fantasy points | ||
| Fantasy points per game (PPR) | 19.8 | 11.6 |
| Fantasy points (PPR) | 79.1 | 23.1 |
| Expected points per gameEst. | 14.3 | 14.0 |
| Points vs expectedEst. | +5.9 | −2.4 |
Week by week
Each bar is one game. Pick a stat to compare.
Pass attempts by week
Passes he threw.
- Lamar Jackson
- Tanner McKee
— no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.
| Week | Lamar Jackson | Tanner McKee |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25against IND | — no game with a target, carry or dropback |
| 2 | 31against NO | — no game with a target, carry or dropback |
| 3 | 20against DAL | — no game with a target, carry or dropback |
| 4 | 20against TEN | — no game with a target, carry or dropback |
| 5 | — no game with a target, carry or dropback | — no game with a target, carry or dropback |
| 6 | — no game with a target, carry or dropback | 45against CAR |
| 7 | — no game with a target, carry or dropback | 35against DAL |
Next to each number: that week's opponent. — no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.
Where they rank
Each player's place among players at his position who meet the leaderboard's minimum. Open a leaderboard for the full list.
| Leaderboard | Lamar Jackson | Tanner McKee |
|---|---|---|
| EPA per dropback leaders | #2of 40 quarterbacks | #35of 40 quarterbacks |
| CPOE leaders | #2of 40 quarterbacks | #36of 40 quarterbacks |
| Goal-line carry leaders | #17of 56 quarterbacks | #51of 56 quarterbacks |
| Expected fantasy points leadersEst. | #28of 56 quarterbacks | #30of 56 quarterbacks |
Talking points
Fact-checked notes from the weekly usage report, with the numbers behind them.
Lamar Jackson
Tanner McKee
No talking points for him in this week's report.
Keep exploring
Lamar Jackson
More comparisons