Fantasy FootballOutsiders

Usage comparison · Wide receivers

Chris Blair vs Laquon Treadwell

Chris Blair gets more of his team's passes (10% vs 9%), while Laquon Treadwell gets more of the deep throws (16% of his team's air yards vs 15%). In total, though, Laquon Treadwell has more targets (11 vs 3). Chris Blair has played 1 game and Laquon Treadwell 4 games. Near the end zone, Laquon Treadwell has had more chances (2 vs 0 plays within 20 yards). Laquon Treadwell is scoring more fantasy points a game (5.3 vs 1.6, PPR), but the chances Chris Blair gets usually score more: 4.6 vs 4.5 expected points a game Est..

2026 season · Weeks 1–4 · Updated Oct 5, 2026

WRATL

Chris Blair
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
1.6
Expected points per gameEst.
4.6

1 game with a target, carry or dropback

WRIND

Laquon Treadwell
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
5.3
Expected points per gameEst.
4.5

4 games with a target, carry or dropback

Side by side

Season totals through week 3. Shares are of each player's team totals in the games he played. For counts and shares, the bigger number is in bold and the bars grow from the centre line.
Chris Blair and Laquon Treadwell, season usage side by side
StatChris BlairLaquon Treadwell
Games14
Passes thrown to him
Targets311
Target share10%9%
Air-yards share15%16%
Catches19
Receiving yards6123
Near the end zone
Red-zone chances02
Red-zone share—6%
End-zone targets00
Touchdowns
Touchdowns00
Expected touchdownsEst.0.00.3
Fantasy points
Fantasy points per game (PPR)1.65.3
Fantasy points (PPR)1.621.3
Expected points per gameEst.4.64.5
Points vs expectedEst.−3.0+0.8

Week by week

Each bar is one game. Pick a stat to compare.

Target share by week

Out of all the passes his team threw in his games, the part thrown to him.

  • Chris Blair
  • Laquon Treadwell

— no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Target share by week
WeekChris BlairLaquon Treadwell
1— no game with a target, carry or dropback3%against BAL
210%against CAR10%against KC
3— no game with a target, carry or dropback3%against HOU
4— no game with a target, carry or dropback21%against WAS

Next to each number: that week's opponent. — no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Where they rank

Each player's place among players at his position who meet the leaderboard's minimum. Open a leaderboard for the full list.
Leaderboard ranks for Chris Blair and Laquon Treadwell
LeaderboardChris BlairLaquon Treadwell
Target share leadersBelow the minimum (at least 10 targets in at least 2 games)#92of 96 wide receivers
Air-yards share leadersBelow the minimum (at least 10 targets in at least 2 games)#74of 96 wide receivers
Red-zone share leadersBelow the minimum (at least 3 red-zone opportunities in at least 2 games)Below the minimum (at least 3 red-zone opportunities in at least 2 games)
Red-zone opportunity leaders#122of 174 wide receivers#63of 174 wide receivers
End-zone target leaders#100of 174 wide receivers#147of 174 wide receivers
Expected fantasy points leadersEst.#109of 174 wide receivers#113of 174 wide receivers

Talking points

Fact-checked notes from the weekly usage report, with the numbers behind them.

Chris Blair

No talking points for him in this week's report.

Laquon Treadwell

Role up

Laquon Treadwell's target share rose to 21% in week 4 (6 targets), from 5% in weeks 1-3.

Target share, week 4
21%
Targets, week 4
6
Target share, weeks 1–3
5%
Targets, weeks 1–3
5

Weeks 1–4 · 4 games

  • Share of team targets/carries in games he played. Snap counts aren't in FFO's licensed data, so a low earlier share can mean limited playing time.

Keep exploring

Chris Blair

More comparisons

Laquon Treadwell

More comparisons

Compare two other players →