Fantasy FootballOutsiders

Usage comparison · Wide receivers

David Moore vs Laquon Treadwell

Laquon Treadwell gets more of his team's passes (9% vs 5%) and more of the deep throws (16% of its air yards vs 13%). David Moore has played 1 game and Laquon Treadwell 4 games. Near the end zone, Laquon Treadwell has had more chances (2 vs 0 plays within 20 yards) and a bigger share of his team's chances there (6% vs 0%). Laquon Treadwell is scoring more fantasy points a game (5.3 vs 0.0, PPR), though their chances usually score the same: 4.5 expected points a game Est..

2026 season · Weeks 1–4 · Updated Oct 5, 2026

WRCAR

David Moore
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
0.0
Expected points per gameEst.
4.5

1 game with a target, carry or dropback

WRIND

Laquon Treadwell
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
5.3
Expected points per gameEst.
4.5

4 games with a target, carry or dropback

Side by side

Season totals through week 3. Shares are of each player's team totals in the games he played. For counts and shares, the bigger number is in bold and the bars grow from the centre line.
David Moore and Laquon Treadwell, season usage side by side
StatDavid MooreLaquon Treadwell
Games14
Passes thrown to him
Targets211
Target share5%9%
Air-yards share13%16%
Catches09
Receiving yards0123
Near the end zone
Red-zone chances02
Red-zone share0%6%
End-zone targets10
Touchdowns
Touchdowns00
Expected touchdownsEst.0.20.3
Fantasy points
Fantasy points per game (PPR)0.05.3
Fantasy points (PPR)0.021.3
Expected points per gameEst.4.54.5
Points vs expectedEst.−4.5+0.8

Week by week

Each bar is one game. Pick a stat to compare.

Target share by week

Out of all the passes his team threw in his games, the part thrown to him.

  • David Moore
  • Laquon Treadwell

— no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Target share by week
WeekDavid MooreLaquon Treadwell
1— no game with a target, carry or dropback3%against BAL
2— no game with a target, carry or dropback10%against KC
35%against CLE3%against HOU
4— no game with a target, carry or dropback21%against WAS

Next to each number: that week's opponent. — no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Where they rank

Each player's place among players at his position who meet the leaderboard's minimum. Open a leaderboard for the full list.
Leaderboard ranks for David Moore and Laquon Treadwell
LeaderboardDavid MooreLaquon Treadwell
Target share leadersBelow the minimum (at least 10 targets in at least 2 games)#92of 96 wide receivers
Air-yards share leadersBelow the minimum (at least 10 targets in at least 2 games)#74of 96 wide receivers
Red-zone share leadersBelow the minimum (at least 3 red-zone opportunities in at least 2 games)Below the minimum (at least 3 red-zone opportunities in at least 2 games)
Red-zone opportunity leaders#128of 174 wide receivers#63of 174 wide receivers
End-zone target leaders#57of 174 wide receivers#147of 174 wide receivers
Expected fantasy points leadersEst.#112of 174 wide receivers#113of 174 wide receivers

Talking points

Fact-checked notes from the weekly usage report, with the numbers behind them.

David Moore

No talking points for him in this week's report.

Laquon Treadwell

Role up

Laquon Treadwell's target share rose to 21% in week 4 (6 targets), from 5% in weeks 1-3.

Target share, week 4
21%
Targets, week 4
6
Target share, weeks 1–3
5%
Targets, weeks 1–3
5

Weeks 1–4 · 4 games

  • Share of team targets/carries in games he played. Snap counts aren't in FFO's licensed data, so a low earlier share can mean limited playing time.

Keep exploring

David Moore

More comparisons

Laquon Treadwell

More comparisons

Compare two other players →