Fantasy FootballOutsiders

Usage comparison · Tight ends

Cade Otton vs Colston Loveland

Cade Otton gets more of his team's passes (19% vs 15%) and more of the deep throws (15% of its air yards vs 11%). Near the end zone, Colston Loveland has had more chances (6 vs 2 plays within 20 yards) and a bigger share of his team's chances there (9% vs 6%). Cade Otton is scoring more fantasy points a game (7.7 vs 5.0, PPR), and his chances usually score more too: 8.9 vs 8.2 expected points a game Est..

2026 season · Weeks 1–4 · Updated Oct 5, 2026

TETB

Cade Otton
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
7.7
Expected points per gameEst.
8.9

4 games with a target, carry or dropback

TECHI

Colston Loveland
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
5.0
Expected points per gameEst.
8.2

4 games with a target, carry or dropback

Side by side

Season totals through week 3. Shares are of each player's team totals in the games he played. For counts and shares, the bigger number is in bold and the bars grow from the centre line.
Cade Otton and Colston Loveland, season usage side by side
StatCade OttonColston Loveland
Games44
Passes thrown to him
Targets2318
Target share19%15%
Air-yards share15%11%
Catches1511
Receiving yards15791
Near the end zone
Red-zone chances26
Red-zone share6%9%
End-zone targets02
Touchdowns
Touchdowns00
Expected touchdownsEst.0.31.6
Fantasy points
Fantasy points per game (PPR)7.75.0
Fantasy points (PPR)30.720.1
Expected points per gameEst.8.98.2
Points vs expectedEst.−1.3−3.2

Week by week

Each bar is one game. Pick a stat to compare.

Target share by week

Out of all the passes his team threw in his games, the part thrown to him.

  • Cade Otton
  • Colston Loveland
Target share by week
WeekCade OttonColston Loveland
119%against CIN8%against CAR
218%against CLE10%against MIN
317%against MIN12%against PHI
423%against GB29%against NYJ

Next to each number: that week's opponent.

Where they rank

Each player's place among players at his position who meet the leaderboard's minimum. Open a leaderboard for the full list.
Leaderboard ranks for Cade Otton and Colston Loveland
LeaderboardCade OttonColston Loveland
Target share leaders#11of 34 tight ends#20of 34 tight ends
Air-yards share leaders#12of 34 tight ends#16of 34 tight ends
Red-zone share leadersBelow the minimum (at least 3 red-zone opportunities in at least 2 games)#16of 21 tight ends
Red-zone opportunity leaders#23of 96 tight ends#4of 96 tight ends
End-zone target leaders#48of 96 tight ends#9of 96 tight ends
Expected fantasy points leadersEst.#17of 96 tight ends#20of 96 tight ends

Talking points

Fact-checked notes from the weekly usage report, with the numbers behind them.

Cade Otton

No talking points for him in this week's report.

Colston Loveland

Role up

Colston Loveland's target share rose to 29% in week 4 (9 targets), from 10% in weeks 1-3.

Target share, week 4
29%
Targets, week 4
9
Target share, weeks 1–3
10%
Targets, weeks 1–3
9

Weeks 1–4 · 4 games

  • Share of team targets/carries in games he played. Snap counts aren't in FFO's licensed data, so a low earlier share can mean limited playing time.

Touchdowns below usage

Colston Loveland has scored 0 touchdowns on opportunities that usually produce 1.6, per FFO's expected-points model.

Touchdowns
0
Expected touchdownsEst.
1.6
Expected PPR per gameEst.
8.2
PPR vs expected, per gameEst.
−3.2

Weeks 1–4 · 4 games

  • Model estimate, not a forecast: v1 predicts about as well as raw points.

Keep exploring

Cade Otton

More comparisons

Colston Loveland

More comparisons

Compare two other players →