Team usage · CHI

Chicago Bears

Who gets the ball in Bears games: the passes, the runs and the chances near the end zone.

2026 season · Weeks 1–9 · Report built Nov 9, 2026, 7:51 PM UTC

Showing the saved fallback report. The latest report could not be confirmed; use the coverage and build date shown here.

Historical game data. Injury designations apply only to their stated report week; confirm current availability before setting a lineup.

Every week so far

Switches the target, backfield and red-zone tables below.

Target distribution

Out of every 10 passes the team throws, how many go to each player. More passes mean more chances to score.

Player	Position	Target share	Games	Targets	Air-yards share	WOPR	End-zone targets
Luther Burden III	WR	22%	9	65	21%	0.48	4
Colston Loveland	TE	20%	9	57	17%	0.41	4
Rome Odunze	WR	17%	9	51	31%	0.48	6
Kalif Raymond	WR	14%	9	41	12%	0.29	0
D'Andre Swift	RB	10%	9	29	−1%	0.14	0
Roschon Johnson	RB	7%	5	11	2%	0.11	1
Cole Kmet	TE	6%	7	14	5%	0.13	1
Zavion Thomas	WR	6%	5	10	9%	0.15	0
Sam Roush	TE	5%	4	7	2%	0.10	0
Kyle Monangai	RB	4%	4	5	0%	0.06	0
Jahdae Walker	WR	3%	2	2	5%	0.08	1

Backfield split

Out of every 10 runs, how many each player gets. It shows who the main running back is.

Player	Position	Carry share	Games	Carries	Goal-line runs	Red-zone share
D'Andre Swift	RB	51%	9	155	19	32%
Kyle Monangai	RB	38%	4	60	6	21%
Salvon Ahmed	RB	23%	1	5	0	10%
Roschon Johnson	RB	16%	5	29	4	18%
Caleb Williams	QB	16%	6	31	2	12%
Case Keenum	QB	8%	2	5	1	9%
Tyson Bagent	QB	6%	3	7	0	11%

Red-zone share

Passes and runs that start within 20 yards of the end zone: the closest chances to score.

Player	Position	Red-zone share	Games	Red-zone chances	Goal-line runs	End-zone targets
D'Andre Swift	RB	32%	9	41	19	0
Kyle Monangai	RB	21%	4	15	6	0
Roschon Johnson	RB	18%	5	13	4	1
Caleb Williams	QB	12%	6	9	2	0
Luther Burden III	WR	11%	9	14	1	4
Tyson Bagent	QB	11%	3	5	0	0
Salvon Ahmed	RB	10%	1	1	0	0
Case Keenum	QB	9%	2	3	1	0
Colston Loveland	TE	9%	9	11	0	4
Rome Odunze	WR	5%	9	7	0	6
Kalif Raymond	WR	5%	9	7	0	0
Jahdae Walker	WR	4%	2	1	0	1
Sam Roush	TE	1%	4	1	0	0
Cole Kmet	TE	1%	7	1	0	1

Quarterback

Whoever played most recently is listed first.

Player	Last game	Games	Dropbacks	EPA per dropback	CPOE (accuracy)	Carries	Expected points per game Est.
Caleb Williams	Week 9	6	209	+0.15	+6.4	31	17.4
Tyson Bagent	Week 5	3	68	−0.08	+1.8	7	11.1
Case Keenum	Week 5	2	55	−0.08	+0.2	5	14.8

Target share by week

Out of every 10 passes each week, how many went to each player. A dash means no passes, runs or pass plays for him that week (a bye week, or he didn't play or get a chance).

Player	Week 1	Week 2	Week 3	Week 4	Week 5	Week 6	Week 7	Week 8	Week 9	Season
Luther Burden III WR	19%	23%	32%	19%	15%	24%	13%	26%	26%	22%
Colston Loveland TE	8%	10%	12%	29%	13%	21%	40%	26%	18%	20%
Rome Odunze WR	12%	13%	18%	23%	23%	12%	17%	18%	21%	17%
Kalif Raymond WR	35%	17%	21%	6%	10%	6%	7%	9%	21%	14%
D'Andre Swift RB	4%	17%	9%	6%	13%	15%	13%	9%	3%	10%
Roschon Johnson RB	—	—	—	3%	18%	6%	0%	3%	—	7%
Cole Kmet TE	12%	3%	3%	6%	5%	6%	10%	—	—	6%
Zavion Thomas WR	—	—	3%	—	3%	9%	—	9%	6%	6%

Bears talking points

Kyle Monangai

RBCHIRole up

Kyle Monangai's share of CHI carries rose to 56% in week 4 (30 carries), from 29% in weeks 1-3.

Carry share, week 4: 56%
Carries, week 4: 30
Carry share, weeks 1–3: 29%

Observed: Weeks 1–4 · 4 games

Share of team targets/carries in games he played. Snap counts aren't in FFO's licensed data, so a low earlier share can mean limited playing time.

Rome Odunze

WRCHITouchdowns below usage

Rome Odunze has scored 1 touchdown on modeled targets and carries that usually produce 3.3, per FFO's expected-points model.

Touchdowns: 1
Expected touchdownsEst.: 3.3
Expected PPR per gameEst.: 10.7
PPR vs expected, per gameEst.: −0.6

Observed: Weeks 1–9 · 9 games

Model estimate, not a forecast: v1 predicts about as well as raw points.

What the Bears defense allows

Per game, what opposing quarterbacks, running backs, wide receivers and tight ends have done against the Bears in weeks 1–9. Ranks compare every defense.

QBvs Quarterbacks
17.8
fantasy points a game (PPR)
The 13th most of the 32 defenses
Per game
- 28.9pass attempts
- 235.6passing yards
- 2.3carries
- 0.7red-zone chances
Every defense vs quarterbacks →
RBvs Running backs
20.2
fantasy points a game (PPR)
The 13th fewest of the 32 defenses
Per game
- 17.9carries
- 5.3targets
- 4.2catches
- 3.6red-zone chances
Every defense vs running backs →
WRvs Wide receivers
30.1
fantasy points a game (PPR)
The 12th fewest of the 32 defenses
Per game
- 16.0targets
- 9.2catches
- 201.0air yards
- 2.3red-zone chances
Every defense vs wide receivers →
TEvs Tight ends
11.4
fantasy points a game (PPR)
The 10th fewest of the 32 defenses
Per game
- 6.6targets
- 4.4catches
- 33.9air yards
- 1.3red-zone chances
Every defense vs tight ends →

Game by game

Fantasy points (PPR) that opposing players scored against the Bears in each game.

Fantasy points allowed by the Chicago Bears defense, by week and position
Week	Opponent	Quarterbacks	Running backs	Wide receivers	Tight ends
1	CAR	33.8	33.7	44.3	12.2
2	MIN	6.3	14.7	12.6	9.3
3	PHI	10.6	10.6	23.6	3.3
4	NYJ	8.8	8.7	21.0	2.1
5	GB	25.1	24.1	58.6	11.6
6	ATL	23.1	10.3	34.8	24.6
7	NE	27.4	28.1	15.7	28.7
8	SEA	17.5	12.5	39.1	4.3
9	TB	7.7	39.1	21.3	6.5

All teams Defense matchups Target share leaders Carry share leaders