Usage comparison · Tight ends

Cade Otton vs Pat Freiermuth

Cade Otton gets more of his team's passes (18% vs 13%) and more of the deep throws (14% of its air yards vs 11%). In total, though, Pat Freiermuth has more targets (19 vs 17). Cade Otton has played 3 games and Pat Freiermuth 4 games. Near the end zone, Pat Freiermuth has had more chances (3 vs 2 plays within 20 yards) and a bigger share of his team's chances there (13% vs 9%). Pat Freiermuth is scoring more fantasy points a game (9.7 vs 7.7, PPR), but the chances Cade Otton gets usually score more: 8.9 vs 8.6 expected points a game Est..

2026 season · Weeks 1–4 · Updated Oct 2, 2026

TETB

Cade Otton

Fantasy points per game (PPR): 7.7
Expected points per gameEst.: 8.9

3 games with a target, carry or dropback

TEPIT

Pat Freiermuth

Fantasy points per game (PPR): 9.7
Expected points per gameEst.: 8.6

4 games with a target, carry or dropback

Side by side

Season totals through week 3. Shares are of each player's team totals in the games he played. For counts and shares, the bigger number is in bold and the bars grow from the centre line.

Cade Otton and Pat Freiermuth, season usage side by side
Stat	Cade Otton	Pat Freiermuth
Games	3	4
Passes thrown to him
Targets	17	19
Target share	18%	13%
Air-yards share	14%	11%
Catches	11	14
Receiving yards	120	125
Near the end zone
Red-zone chances	2	3
Red-zone share	9%	13%
End-zone targets	0	2
Touchdowns
Touchdowns	0	2
Expected touchdownsEst.	0.2	1.0
Fantasy points
Fantasy points per game (PPR)	7.7	9.7
Fantasy points (PPR)	23.0	38.8
Expected points per gameEst.	8.9	8.6
Points vs expectedEst.	−1.3	+1.1

Week by week

Each bar is one game. Pick a stat to compare.

Target share by week

Out of all the passes his team threw in his games, the part thrown to him.

Cade Otton
Pat Freiermuth

— no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Target share by week
Week	Cade Otton	Pat Freiermuth
1	19%against CIN	14%against ATL
2	18%against CLE	14%against NE
3	17%against MIN	13%against CIN
4	— no game with a target, carry or dropback	13%against CLE

Next to each number: that week's opponent. — no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Where they rank

Each player's place among players at his position who meet the leaderboard's minimum. Open a leaderboard for the full list.

Leaderboard ranks for Cade Otton and Pat Freiermuth
Leaderboard	Cade Otton	Pat Freiermuth
Target share leaders	#11of 30 tight ends	#21of 30 tight ends
Air-yards share leaders	#10of 30 tight ends	#17of 30 tight ends
Red-zone share leaders	Below the minimum (at least 3 red-zone opportunities in at least 2 games)	#6of 14 tight ends
Red-zone opportunity leaders	#17of 93 tight ends	#14of 93 tight ends
End-zone target leaders	#43of 93 tight ends	#15of 93 tight ends
Expected fantasy points leadersEst.	#16of 93 tight ends	#18of 93 tight ends

Keep exploring

Cade Otton

More comparisons

Pat Freiermuth

More comparisons

Compare two other players →