Usage comparison · Wide receivers
Mitchell Tinsley vs Parker Washington
Parker Washington gets more of his team's passes (26% vs 13%) and more of the deep throws (40% of its air yards vs 21%). Mitchell Tinsley has played 1 game and Parker Washington 6 games. Near the end zone, Parker Washington has had more chances (8 vs 3 plays within 20 yards), but Mitchell Tinsley gets a bigger share of his team's chances there (30% vs 13%). Parker Washington is scoring more fantasy points a game (15.3 vs 7.9, PPR), but the chances Mitchell Tinsley gets usually score more: 14.6 vs 14.5 expected points a game Est..
2026 season · Weeks 1–6 · Updated Oct 19, 2026
WRCIN
Mitchell Tinsley- Fantasy points per game (PPR)
- 7.9
- Expected points per gameEst.
- 14.6
1 game with a target, carry or dropback
WRJAX
Parker Washington- Fantasy points per game (PPR)
- 15.3
- Expected points per gameEst.
- 14.5
6 games with a target, carry or dropback
Side by side
| Stat | Mitchell Tinsley | Parker Washington |
|---|---|---|
| Games | 1 | 6 |
| Passes thrown to him | ||
| Targets | 7 | 46 |
| Target share | 13% | 26% |
| Air-yards share | 21% | 40% |
| Catches | 3 | 26 |
| Receiving yards | 49 | 416 |
| Near the end zone | ||
| Red-zone chances | 3 | 8 |
| Red-zone share | 30% | 13% |
| End-zone targets | 1 | 4 |
| Touchdowns | ||
| Touchdowns | 0 | 4 |
| Expected touchdownsEst. | 0.9 | 3.4 |
| Fantasy points | ||
| Fantasy points per game (PPR) | 7.9 | 15.3 |
| Fantasy points (PPR) | 7.9 | 91.9 |
| Expected points per gameEst. | 14.6 | 14.5 |
| Points vs expectedEst. | −6.7 | +0.8 |
Week by week
Target share by week
Out of all the passes his team threw in his games, the part thrown to him.
- Mitchell Tinsley
- Parker Washington
— no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.
| Week | Mitchell Tinsley | Parker Washington |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | — no game with a target, carry or dropback | 29%against CLE |
| 2 | — no game with a target, carry or dropback | 43%against DEN |
| 3 | — no game with a target, carry or dropback | 19%against NE |
| 4 | 13%against JAX | 13%against CIN |
| 5 | — no game with a target, carry or dropback | 24%against PHI |
| 6 | — no game with a target, carry or dropback | 27%against HOU |
Next to each number: that week's opponent. — no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.
Where they rank
| Leaderboard | Mitchell Tinsley | Parker Washington |
|---|---|---|
| Target share leaders | Below the minimum (at least 10 targets in at least 2 games) | #15of 109 wide receivers |
| Air-yards share leaders | Below the minimum (at least 10 targets in at least 2 games) | #12of 109 wide receivers |
| Red-zone share leaders | Below the minimum (at least 3 red-zone opportunities in at least 2 games) | #19of 74 wide receivers |
| Red-zone opportunity leaders | #70of 187 wide receivers | #8of 187 wide receivers |
| End-zone target leaders | #99of 187 wide receivers | #25of 187 wide receivers |
| Expected fantasy points leadersEst. | #18of 187 wide receivers | #19of 187 wide receivers |
Keep exploring
Mitchell Tinsley
More comparisons
Parker Washington
More comparisons