Usage comparison · Wide receivers

Parker Washington vs Tee Higgins

Parker Washington gets more of his team's passes (26% vs 23%), while Tee Higgins gets more of the deep throws (42% of his team's air yards vs 40%). Parker Washington has played 6 games and Tee Higgins 5 games. Near the end zone, Parker Washington has had more chances (8 vs 2 plays within 20 yards) and a bigger share of his team's chances there (13% vs 4%). Parker Washington is scoring more fantasy points a game (15.3 vs 15.1, PPR), and his chances usually score more too: 14.5 vs 14.3 expected points a game Est..

2026 season · Weeks 1–6 · Updated Oct 19, 2026

WRJAX

Parker Washington
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
15.3
Expected points per gameEst.
14.5

6 games with a target, carry or dropback

WRCIN

Tee Higgins
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
15.1
Expected points per gameEst.
14.3

5 games with a target, carry or dropback

Side by side

Season totals through week 5. Shares are of each player's team totals in the games he played. For counts and shares, the bigger number is in bold and the bars grow from the centre line.
Parker Washington and Tee Higgins, season usage side by side
StatParker WashingtonTee Higgins
Games65
Passes thrown to him
Targets4643
Target share26%23%
Air-yards share40%42%
Catches2627
Receiving yards416423
Near the end zone
Red-zone chances82
Red-zone share13%4%
End-zone targets41
Touchdowns
Touchdowns41
Expected touchdownsEst.3.40.8
Fantasy points
Fantasy points per game (PPR)15.315.1
Fantasy points (PPR)91.975.3
Expected points per gameEst.14.514.3
Points vs expectedEst.+0.8+0.7

Week by week

Each bar is one game. Pick a stat to compare.

Target share by week

Out of all the passes his team threw in his games, the part thrown to him.

  • Parker Washington
  • Tee Higgins

— no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Target share by week
WeekParker WashingtonTee Higgins
129%against CLE18%against TB
243%against DEN32%against HOU
319%against NE19%against PIT
413%against CIN30%against JAX
524%against PHI13%against MIA
627%against HOU— no game with a target, carry or dropback

Next to each number: that week's opponent. — no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Where they rank

Each player's place among players at his position who meet the leaderboard's minimum. Open a leaderboard for the full list.
Leaderboard ranks for Parker Washington and Tee Higgins
LeaderboardParker WashingtonTee Higgins
Target share leaders#15of 109 wide receivers#25of 109 wide receivers
Air-yards share leaders#12of 109 wide receivers#9of 109 wide receivers
Red-zone share leaders#19of 74 wide receiversBelow the minimum (at least 3 red-zone opportunities in at least 2 games)
Red-zone opportunity leaders#8of 187 wide receivers#90of 187 wide receivers
End-zone target leaders#25of 187 wide receivers#106of 187 wide receivers
Expected fantasy points leadersEst.#19of 187 wide receivers#20of 187 wide receivers

Talking points

Fact-checked notes from the weekly usage report, with the numbers behind them.

Parker Washington

No talking points for him in this week's report.

Tee Higgins

Role down

Tee Higgins's target share fell to 13% in week 5 (4 targets), from 25% in weeks 1-4.

Target share, week 5
13%
Targets, week 5
4
Target share, weeks 1–4
25%
Targets, weeks 1–4
39

Weeks 1–5 · 5 games

  • Share of team targets/carries in games he played. Snap counts aren't in FFO's licensed data, so a low earlier share can mean limited playing time.

Keep exploring