Fantasy FootballOutsiders

Usage comparison · Wide receivers

Emeka Egbuka vs Mitchell Tinsley

Emeka Egbuka gets more of his team's passes (26% vs 13%) and more of the deep throws (33% of its air yards vs 21%). Emeka Egbuka has played 6 games and Mitchell Tinsley 1 game. Near the end zone, Emeka Egbuka has had more chances (7 vs 3 plays within 20 yards), but Mitchell Tinsley gets a bigger share of his team's chances there (30% vs 14%). Emeka Egbuka is scoring more fantasy points a game (11.9 vs 7.9, PPR), and his chances usually score more too: 14.9 vs 14.6 expected points a game Est..

2026 season · Weeks 1–6 · Updated Oct 19, 2026

WRTB

Emeka Egbuka
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
11.9
Expected points per gameEst.
14.9

6 games with a target, carry or dropback

WRCIN

Mitchell Tinsley
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
7.9
Expected points per gameEst.
14.6

1 game with a target, carry or dropback

Side by side

Season totals through week 5. Shares are of each player's team totals in the games he played. For counts and shares, the bigger number is in bold and the bars grow from the centre line.
Emeka Egbuka and Mitchell Tinsley, season usage side by side
StatEmeka EgbukaMitchell Tinsley
Games61
Passes thrown to him
Targets497
Target share26%13%
Air-yards share33%21%
Catches283
Receiving yards24049
Near the end zone
Red-zone chances73
Red-zone share14%30%
End-zone targets41
Touchdowns
Touchdowns30
Expected touchdownsEst.3.00.9
Fantasy points
Fantasy points per game (PPR)11.97.9
Fantasy points (PPR)71.17.9
Expected points per gameEst.14.914.6
Points vs expectedEst.−3.1−6.7

Week by week

Each bar is one game. Pick a stat to compare.

Target share by week

Out of all the passes his team threw in his games, the part thrown to him.

  • Emeka Egbuka
  • Mitchell Tinsley

— no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Target share by week
WeekEmeka EgbukaMitchell Tinsley
122%against CIN— no game with a target, carry or dropback
215%against CLE— no game with a target, carry or dropback
326%against MIN— no game with a target, carry or dropback
415%against GB13%against JAX
536%against DAL— no game with a target, carry or dropback
639%against PIT— no game with a target, carry or dropback

Next to each number: that week's opponent. — no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Where they rank

Each player's place among players at his position who meet the leaderboard's minimum. Open a leaderboard for the full list.
Leaderboard ranks for Emeka Egbuka and Mitchell Tinsley
LeaderboardEmeka EgbukaMitchell Tinsley
Target share leaders#14of 109 wide receiversBelow the minimum (at least 10 targets in at least 2 games)
Air-yards share leaders#25of 109 wide receiversBelow the minimum (at least 10 targets in at least 2 games)
Red-zone share leaders#14of 74 wide receiversBelow the minimum (at least 3 red-zone opportunities in at least 2 games)
Red-zone opportunity leaders#12of 187 wide receivers#70of 187 wide receivers
End-zone target leaders#19of 187 wide receivers#99of 187 wide receivers
Expected fantasy points leadersEst.#16of 187 wide receivers#18of 187 wide receivers

Talking points

Fact-checked notes from the weekly usage report, with the numbers behind them.

Emeka Egbuka

Role up

Emeka Egbuka's target share rose to 39% in week 6 (16 targets), from 23% in weeks 1-5.

Target share, week 6
39%
Targets, week 6
16
Target share, weeks 1–5
23%
Targets, weeks 1–5
33

Weeks 1–6 · 6 games

  • Share of team targets/carries in games he played. Snap counts aren't in FFO's licensed data, so a low earlier share can mean limited playing time.

Volume, not production

Emeka Egbuka has 33% of TB's air yards but is scoring 3.1 PPR points a game below what that usage usually produces.

Air-yards share
33%
Targets
49
PPR vs expected, per gameEst.
−3.1

Weeks 1–6 · 6 games

Mitchell Tinsley

No talking points for him in this week's report.

Keep exploring

Emeka Egbuka

More comparisons

Mitchell Tinsley

More comparisons

Compare two other players →