Usage comparison · Wide receivers

Mitchell Tinsley vs Nico Collins

Nico Collins gets more of his team's passes (23% vs 13%) and more of the deep throws (31% of its air yards vs 21%). Mitchell Tinsley has played 1 game and Nico Collins 4 games. Near the end zone, Nico Collins has had more chances (6 vs 3 plays within 20 yards), but Mitchell Tinsley gets a bigger share of his team's chances there (30% vs 16%). Nico Collins is scoring more fantasy points a game (18.4 vs 7.9, PPR), and his chances usually score more too: 14.8 vs 14.6 expected points a game Est..

2026 season · Weeks 1–6 · Updated Oct 19, 2026

WRCIN

Mitchell Tinsley
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
7.9
Expected points per gameEst.
14.6

1 game with a target, carry or dropback

WRHOU

Nico Collins
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
18.4
Expected points per gameEst.
14.8

4 games with a target, carry or dropback

Side by side

Season totals through week 5. Shares are of each player's team totals in the games he played. For counts and shares, the bigger number is in bold and the bars grow from the centre line.
Mitchell Tinsley and Nico Collins, season usage side by side
StatMitchell TinsleyNico Collins
Games14
Passes thrown to him
Targets730
Target share13%23%
Air-yards share21%31%
Catches322
Receiving yards49323
Near the end zone
Red-zone chances36
Red-zone share30%16%
End-zone targets14
Touchdowns
Touchdowns03
Expected touchdownsEst.0.92.6
Fantasy points
Fantasy points per game (PPR)7.918.4
Fantasy points (PPR)7.973.5
Expected points per gameEst.14.614.8
Points vs expectedEst.−6.7+3.6

Week by week

Each bar is one game. Pick a stat to compare.

Target share by week

Out of all the passes his team threw in his games, the part thrown to him.

  • Mitchell Tinsley
  • Nico Collins

— no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Target share by week
WeekMitchell TinsleyNico Collins
1— no game with a target, carry or dropback27%against BUF
2— no game with a target, carry or dropback— no game with a target, carry or dropback
3— no game with a target, carry or dropback— no game with a target, carry or dropback
413%against JAX31%against DAL
5— no game with a target, carry or dropback21%against TEN
6— no game with a target, carry or dropback16%against JAX

Next to each number: that week's opponent. — no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Where they rank

Each player's place among players at his position who meet the leaderboard's minimum. Open a leaderboard for the full list.
Leaderboard ranks for Mitchell Tinsley and Nico Collins
LeaderboardMitchell TinsleyNico Collins
Target share leadersBelow the minimum (at least 10 targets in at least 2 games)#24of 109 wide receivers
Air-yards share leadersBelow the minimum (at least 10 targets in at least 2 games)#32of 109 wide receivers
Red-zone share leadersBelow the minimum (at least 3 red-zone opportunities in at least 2 games)#8of 74 wide receivers
Red-zone opportunity leaders#70of 187 wide receivers#26of 187 wide receivers
End-zone target leaders#99of 187 wide receivers#24of 187 wide receivers
Expected fantasy points leadersEst.#18of 187 wide receivers#17of 187 wide receivers

Talking points

Fact-checked notes from the weekly usage report, with the numbers behind them.

Mitchell Tinsley

No talking points for him in this week's report.

Nico Collins

Role down

Nico Collins's target share fell to 16% in week 6 (5 targets), from 26% in weeks 1-5.

Target share, week 6
16%
Targets, week 6
5
Target share, weeks 1 and 4–5
26%
Targets, weeks 1 and 4–5
25

Weeks 1 and 4–6 · 4 games

  • Share of team targets/carries in games he played. Snap counts aren't in FFO's licensed data, so a low earlier share can mean limited playing time.

Keep exploring