Usage comparison · Tight ends

Gavin Bartholomew vs Noah Fant

Gavin Bartholomew gets more of his team's passes (11% vs 10%) and more of the deep throws (7% of its air yards vs 6%). In total, though, Noah Fant has more targets (14 vs 7). Gavin Bartholomew has played 2 games and Noah Fant 4 games. Near the end zone, Noah Fant has had more chances (3 vs 1 plays within 20 yards) and a bigger share of his team's chances there (8% vs 5%). Noah Fant is scoring more fantasy points a game (8.6 vs 4.9, PPR), and his chances usually score more too: 6.1 vs 6.0 expected points a game Est..

2026 season · Weeks 1–6 · Updated Oct 19, 2026

TEMIN

Gavin Bartholomew
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
4.9
Expected points per gameEst.
6.0

2 games with a target, carry or dropback

TENO

Noah Fant
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
8.6
Expected points per gameEst.
6.1

4 games with a target, carry or dropback

Side by side

Season totals through week 5. Shares are of each player's team totals in the games he played. For counts and shares, the bigger number is in bold and the bars grow from the centre line.
Gavin Bartholomew and Noah Fant, season usage side by side
StatGavin BartholomewNoah Fant
Games24
Passes thrown to him
Targets714
Target share11%10%
Air-yards share7%6%
Catches69
Receiving yards3773
Near the end zone
Red-zone chances13
Red-zone share5%8%
End-zone targets02
Touchdowns
Touchdowns03
Expected touchdownsEst.0.51.0
Fantasy points
Fantasy points per game (PPR)4.98.6
Fantasy points (PPR)9.734.3
Expected points per gameEst.6.06.1
Points vs expectedEst.−1.1+2.5

Week by week

Each bar is one game. Pick a stat to compare.

Target share by week

Out of all the passes his team threw in his games, the part thrown to him.

  • Gavin Bartholomew
  • Noah Fant

— no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Target share by week
WeekGavin BartholomewNoah Fant
1— no game with a target, carry or dropback15%against DET
2— no game with a target, carry or dropback— no game with a target, carry or dropback
3— no game with a target, carry or dropback10%against LV
43%against MIA— no game with a target, carry or dropback
521%against NO4%against MIN
6— no game with a target, carry or dropback3%against NYG

Next to each number: that week's opponent. — no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Where they rank

Each player's place among players at his position who meet the leaderboard's minimum. Open a leaderboard for the full list.
Leaderboard ranks for Gavin Bartholomew and Noah Fant
LeaderboardGavin BartholomewNoah Fant
Target share leadersBelow the minimum (at least 10 targets in at least 2 games)#38of 47 tight ends
Air-yards share leadersBelow the minimum (at least 10 targets in at least 2 games)#38of 47 tight ends
Red-zone share leadersBelow the minimum (at least 3 red-zone opportunities in at least 2 games)#26of 35 tight ends
Red-zone opportunity leaders#61of 104 tight ends#32of 104 tight ends
End-zone target leaders#77of 104 tight ends#23of 104 tight ends
Expected fantasy points leadersEst.#42of 104 tight ends#40of 104 tight ends

Talking points

Fact-checked notes from the weekly usage report, with the numbers behind them.

Gavin Bartholomew

Role up

Gavin Bartholomew's target share rose to 21% in week 5 (6 targets), from 3% in week 4.

Target share, week 5
21%
Targets, week 5
6
Target share, week 4
3%
Targets, week 4
1

Weeks 4–5 · 2 games

  • Share of team targets/carries in games he played. Snap counts aren't in FFO's licensed data, so a low earlier share can mean limited playing time.

Noah Fant

No talking points for him in this week's report.

Keep exploring