Usage comparison · Tight ends

Gavin Bartholomew vs Nate Adkins

Gavin Bartholomew gets more of his team's passes (11% vs 8%), and they get the same share of their teams' air yards (7%). Near the end zone, Nate Adkins has had more chances (3 vs 1 plays within 20 yards) and a bigger share of his team's chances there (11% vs 5%). Nate Adkins is scoring more fantasy points a game (10.3 vs 4.9, PPR), and his chances usually score more too: 6.1 vs 6.0 expected points a game Est..

2026 season · Weeks 1–5 · Updated Oct 12, 2026

TEMIN

Gavin Bartholomew
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
4.9
Expected points per gameEst.
6.0

2 games with a target, carry or dropback

TEDEN

Nate Adkins
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
10.3
Expected points per gameEst.
6.1

2 games with a target, carry or dropback

Side by side

Season totals through week 4. Shares are of each player's team totals in the games he played. For counts and shares, the bigger number is in bold and the bars grow from the centre line.
Gavin Bartholomew and Nate Adkins, season usage side by side
StatGavin BartholomewNate Adkins
Games22
Passes thrown to him
Targets75
Target share11%8%
Air-yards share7%7%
Catches64
Receiving yards3740
Near the end zone
Red-zone chances13
Red-zone share5%11%
End-zone targets01
Touchdowns
Touchdowns02
Expected touchdownsEst.0.50.9
Fantasy points
Fantasy points per game (PPR)4.910.3
Fantasy points (PPR)9.720.6
Expected points per gameEst.6.06.1
Points vs expectedEst.−1.1+4.2

Week by week

Each bar is one game. Pick a stat to compare.

Target share by week

Out of all the passes his team threw in his games, the part thrown to him.

  • Gavin Bartholomew
  • Nate Adkins

— no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Target share by week
WeekGavin BartholomewNate Adkins
1— no game with a target, carry or dropback— no game with a target, carry or dropback
2— no game with a target, carry or dropback10%against JAX
3— no game with a target, carry or dropback6%against LA
43%against MIA— no game with a target, carry or dropback
521%against NO— no game with a target, carry or dropback

Next to each number: that week's opponent. — no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Where they rank

Each player's place among players at his position who meet the leaderboard's minimum. Open a leaderboard for the full list.
Leaderboard ranks for Gavin Bartholomew and Nate Adkins
LeaderboardGavin BartholomewNate Adkins
Target share leadersBelow the minimum (at least 10 targets in at least 2 games)Below the minimum (at least 10 targets in at least 2 games)
Air-yards share leadersBelow the minimum (at least 10 targets in at least 2 games)Below the minimum (at least 10 targets in at least 2 games)
Red-zone share leadersBelow the minimum (at least 3 red-zone opportunities in at least 2 games)#15of 28 tight ends
Red-zone opportunity leaders#55of 101 tight ends#25of 101 tight ends
End-zone target leaders#71of 101 tight ends#41of 101 tight ends
Expected fantasy points leadersEst.#35of 101 tight ends#34of 101 tight ends

Talking points

Fact-checked notes from the weekly usage report, with the numbers behind them.

Gavin Bartholomew

Role up

Gavin Bartholomew's target share rose to 21% in week 5 (6 targets), from 3% in week 4.

Target share, week 5
21%
Targets, week 5
6
Target share, week 4
3%
Targets, week 4
1

Weeks 4–5 · 2 games

  • Share of team targets/carries in games he played. Snap counts aren't in FFO's licensed data, so a low earlier share can mean limited playing time.

Nate Adkins

No talking points for him in this week's report.

Keep exploring