Fantasy FootballOutsiders

Usage comparison · Tight ends

Noah Fant vs Teagan Quitoriano

Noah Fant gets more of his team's passes (10% vs 4%) and more of the deep throws (6% of its air yards vs 3%). Noah Fant has played 4 games and Teagan Quitoriano 1 game. Near the end zone, Noah Fant has had more chances (3 vs 2 plays within 20 yards), but Teagan Quitoriano gets a bigger share of his team's chances there (17% vs 8%). Teagan Quitoriano is scoring more fantasy points a game (15.5 vs 8.6, PPR), and his chances usually score more too: 6.2 vs 6.1 expected points a game Est..

2026 season · Weeks 1–6 · Updated Oct 19, 2026

TENO

Noah Fant
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
8.6
Expected points per gameEst.
6.1

4 games with a target, carry or dropback

TEARI

Teagan Quitoriano
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
15.5
Expected points per gameEst.
6.2

1 game with a target, carry or dropback

Side by side

Season totals through week 5. Shares are of each player's team totals in the games he played. For counts and shares, the bigger number is in bold and the bars grow from the centre line.
Noah Fant and Teagan Quitoriano, season usage side by side
StatNoah FantTeagan Quitoriano
Games41
Passes thrown to him
Targets142
Target share10%4%
Air-yards share6%3%
Catches92
Receiving yards7315
Near the end zone
Red-zone chances32
Red-zone share8%17%
End-zone targets22
Touchdowns
Touchdowns32
Expected touchdownsEst.1.00.8
Fantasy points
Fantasy points per game (PPR)8.615.5
Fantasy points (PPR)34.315.5
Expected points per gameEst.6.16.2
Points vs expectedEst.+2.5+9.3

Week by week

Each bar is one game. Pick a stat to compare.

Target share by week

Out of all the passes his team threw in his games, the part thrown to him.

  • Noah Fant
  • Teagan Quitoriano

— no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Target share by week
WeekNoah FantTeagan Quitoriano
115%against DET— no game with a target, carry or dropback
2— no game with a target, carry or dropback— no game with a target, carry or dropback
310%against LV— no game with a target, carry or dropback
4— no game with a target, carry or dropback— no game with a target, carry or dropback
54%against MIN4%against DET
63%against NYG— no game with a target, carry or dropback

Next to each number: that week's opponent. — no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Where they rank

Each player's place among players at his position who meet the leaderboard's minimum. Open a leaderboard for the full list.
Leaderboard ranks for Noah Fant and Teagan Quitoriano
LeaderboardNoah FantTeagan Quitoriano
Target share leaders#38of 47 tight endsBelow the minimum (at least 10 targets in at least 2 games)
Air-yards share leaders#38of 47 tight endsBelow the minimum (at least 10 targets in at least 2 games)
Red-zone share leaders#26of 35 tight endsBelow the minimum (at least 3 red-zone opportunities in at least 2 games)
Red-zone opportunity leaders#32of 104 tight ends#47of 104 tight ends
End-zone target leaders#23of 104 tight ends#25of 104 tight ends
Expected fantasy points leadersEst.#40of 104 tight ends#38of 104 tight ends

Keep exploring

Noah Fant

More comparisons

Teagan Quitoriano

More comparisons

Compare two other players →