Usage comparison · Wide receivers

Garrett Wilson vs Mitchell Tinsley

Garrett Wilson gets more of his team's passes (30% vs 13%) and more of the deep throws (41% of its air yards vs 21%). Garrett Wilson has played 5 games and Mitchell Tinsley 1 game. Near the end zone, Mitchell Tinsley has had more chances (3 vs 2 plays within 20 yards) and a bigger share of his team's chances there (30% vs 7%). Garrett Wilson is scoring more fantasy points a game (17.3 vs 7.9, PPR), but the chances Mitchell Tinsley gets usually score more: 14.6 vs 14.2 expected points a game Est..

2026 season · Weeks 1–5 · Updated Oct 12, 2026

WRNYJ

Garrett Wilson
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
17.3
Expected points per gameEst.
14.2

5 games with a target, carry or dropback

WRCIN

Mitchell Tinsley
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
7.9
Expected points per gameEst.
14.6

1 game with a target, carry or dropback

Side by side

Season totals through week 4. Shares are of each player's team totals in the games he played. For counts and shares, the bigger number is in bold and the bars grow from the centre line.
Garrett Wilson and Mitchell Tinsley, season usage side by side
StatGarrett WilsonMitchell Tinsley
Games51
Passes thrown to him
Targets427
Target share30%13%
Air-yards share41%21%
Catches313
Receiving yards37449
Near the end zone
Red-zone chances23
Red-zone share7%30%
End-zone targets01
Touchdowns
Touchdowns30
Expected touchdownsEst.1.30.9
Fantasy points
Fantasy points per game (PPR)17.37.9
Fantasy points (PPR)86.47.9
Expected points per gameEst.14.214.6
Points vs expectedEst.+3.1−6.7

Week by week

Each bar is one game. Pick a stat to compare.

Target share by week

Out of all the passes his team threw in his games, the part thrown to him.

  • Garrett Wilson
  • Mitchell Tinsley

— no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Target share by week
WeekGarrett WilsonMitchell Tinsley
130%against TEN— no game with a target, carry or dropback
219%against GB— no game with a target, carry or dropback
336%against DET— no game with a target, carry or dropback
427%against CHI13%against JAX
538%against CLE— no game with a target, carry or dropback

Next to each number: that week's opponent. — no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Where they rank

Each player's place among players at his position who meet the leaderboard's minimum. Open a leaderboard for the full list.
Leaderboard ranks for Garrett Wilson and Mitchell Tinsley
LeaderboardGarrett WilsonMitchell Tinsley
Target share leaders#4of 103 wide receiversBelow the minimum (at least 10 targets in at least 2 games)
Air-yards share leaders#11of 103 wide receiversBelow the minimum (at least 10 targets in at least 2 games)
Red-zone share leadersBelow the minimum (at least 3 red-zone opportunities in at least 2 games)Below the minimum (at least 3 red-zone opportunities in at least 2 games)
Red-zone opportunity leaders#65of 180 wide receivers#56of 180 wide receivers
End-zone target leaders#123of 180 wide receivers#90of 180 wide receivers
Expected fantasy points leadersEst.#17of 180 wide receivers#15of 180 wide receivers

Talking points

Fact-checked notes from the weekly usage report, with the numbers behind them.

Garrett Wilson

Touchdowns above usage

Garrett Wilson has scored 3 touchdowns on opportunities that usually produce 1.3, per FFO's expected-points model.

Touchdowns
3
Expected touchdownsEst.
1.3
Expected PPR per gameEst.
14.2
PPR vs expected, per gameEst.
+3.1

Weeks 1–5 · 5 games

  • Model estimate, not a forecast: v1 predicts about as well as raw points.

Mitchell Tinsley

No talking points for him in this week's report.

Keep exploring