Fantasy FootballOutsiders

Usage comparison · Wide receivers

George Pickens vs Mitchell Tinsley

George Pickens gets more of his team's passes (22% vs 13%) and more of the deep throws (32% of its air yards vs 21%). George Pickens has played 5 games and Mitchell Tinsley 1 game. Near the end zone, George Pickens has had more chances (5 vs 3 plays within 20 yards), but Mitchell Tinsley gets a bigger share of his team's chances there (30% vs 9%). George Pickens is scoring more fantasy points a game (13.7 vs 7.9, PPR), and his chances usually score more too: 15.0 vs 14.6 expected points a game Est..

2026 season · Weeks 1–5 · Updated Oct 9, 2026

WRDAL

George Pickens
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
13.7
Expected points per gameEst.
15.0

5 games with a target, carry or dropback

WRCIN

Mitchell Tinsley
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
7.9
Expected points per gameEst.
14.6

1 game with a target, carry or dropback

Side by side

Season totals through week 4. Shares are of each player's team totals in the games he played. For counts and shares, the bigger number is in bold and the bars grow from the centre line.
George Pickens and Mitchell Tinsley, season usage side by side
StatGeorge PickensMitchell Tinsley
Games51
Passes thrown to him
Targets417
Target share22%13%
Air-yards share32%21%
Catches273
Receiving yards35549
Near the end zone
Red-zone chances53
Red-zone share9%30%
End-zone targets41
Touchdowns
Touchdowns10
Expected touchdownsEst.2.70.9
Fantasy points
Fantasy points per game (PPR)13.77.9
Fantasy points (PPR)68.57.9
Expected points per gameEst.15.014.6
Points vs expectedEst.−1.3−6.7

Week by week

Each bar is one game. Pick a stat to compare.

Target share by week

Out of all the passes his team threw in his games, the part thrown to him.

  • George Pickens
  • Mitchell Tinsley

— no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Target share by week
WeekGeorge PickensMitchell Tinsley
120%against NYG— no game with a target, carry or dropback
226%against WAS— no game with a target, carry or dropback
328%against BAL— no game with a target, carry or dropback
47%against HOU13%against JAX
531%against TB— no game with a target, carry or dropback

Next to each number: that week's opponent. — no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Where they rank

Each player's place among players at his position who meet the leaderboard's minimum. Open a leaderboard for the full list.
Leaderboard ranks for George Pickens and Mitchell Tinsley
LeaderboardGeorge PickensMitchell Tinsley
Target share leaders#29of 98 wide receiversBelow the minimum (at least 10 targets in at least 2 games)
Air-yards share leaders#26of 98 wide receiversBelow the minimum (at least 10 targets in at least 2 games)
Red-zone share leaders#36of 47 wide receiversBelow the minimum (at least 3 red-zone opportunities in at least 2 games)
Red-zone opportunity leaders#14of 174 wide receivers#46of 174 wide receivers
End-zone target leaders#6of 174 wide receivers#78of 174 wide receivers
Expected fantasy points leadersEst.#14of 174 wide receivers#16of 174 wide receivers

Talking points

Fact-checked notes from the weekly usage report, with the numbers behind them.

George Pickens

Role up

George Pickens's target share rose to 31% in week 5 (13 targets), from 19% in weeks 1-4.

Target share, week 5
31%
Targets, week 5
13
Target share, weeks 1–4
19%
Targets, weeks 1–4
28

Weeks 1–5 · 5 games

  • Share of team targets/carries in games he played. Snap counts aren't in FFO's licensed data, so a low earlier share can mean limited playing time.

Touchdowns below usage

George Pickens has scored 1 touchdown on opportunities that usually produce 2.7, per FFO's expected-points model.

Touchdowns
1
Expected touchdownsEst.
2.7
Expected PPR per gameEst.
15.0
PPR vs expected, per gameEst.
−1.3

Weeks 1–5 · 5 games

  • Model estimate, not a forecast: v1 predicts about as well as raw points.

Mitchell Tinsley

No talking points for him in this week's report.

Keep exploring

George Pickens

More comparisons

Mitchell Tinsley

More comparisons

Compare two other players →