Usage comparison · Wide receivers

Mitchell Tinsley vs Tee Higgins

Tee Higgins gets more of the Bengals' passes (23% vs 13%) and more of the deep throws (42% of their air yards vs 21%). Mitchell Tinsley has played 1 game and Tee Higgins 5 games. Near the end zone, Mitchell Tinsley has had more chances (3 vs 2 plays within 20 yards) and a bigger share of the Bengals' chances there (30% vs 4%). Tee Higgins is scoring more fantasy points a game (15.1 vs 7.9, PPR), but the chances Mitchell Tinsley gets usually score more: 14.6 vs 14.3 expected points a game Est..

2026 season · Weeks 1–5 · Updated Oct 12, 2026

WRCIN

Mitchell Tinsley
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
7.9
Expected points per gameEst.
14.6

1 game with a target, carry or dropback

WRCIN

Tee Higgins
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
15.1
Expected points per gameEst.
14.3

5 games with a target, carry or dropback

Week 5 injury report: Questionable (Groin)

Side by side

Season totals through week 4. Shares are of each player's team totals in the games he played. For counts and shares, the bigger number is in bold and the bars grow from the centre line.
Mitchell Tinsley and Tee Higgins, season usage side by side
StatMitchell TinsleyTee Higgins
Games15
Passes thrown to him
Targets743
Target share13%23%
Air-yards share21%42%
Catches327
Receiving yards49423
Near the end zone
Red-zone chances32
Red-zone share30%4%
End-zone targets11
Touchdowns
Touchdowns01
Expected touchdownsEst.0.90.8
Fantasy points
Fantasy points per game (PPR)7.915.1
Fantasy points (PPR)7.975.3
Expected points per gameEst.14.614.3
Points vs expectedEst.−6.7+0.7

Week by week

Each bar is one game. Pick a stat to compare.

Target share by week

Out of all the passes his team threw in his games, the part thrown to him.

  • Mitchell Tinsley
  • Tee Higgins

— no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Target share by week
WeekMitchell TinsleyTee Higgins
1— no game with a target, carry or dropback18%against TB
2— no game with a target, carry or dropback32%against HOU
3— no game with a target, carry or dropback19%against PIT
413%against JAX30%against JAX
5— no game with a target, carry or dropback13%against MIA

Next to each number: that week's opponent. — no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Where they rank

Each player's place among players at his position who meet the leaderboard's minimum. Open a leaderboard for the full list.
Leaderboard ranks for Mitchell Tinsley and Tee Higgins
LeaderboardMitchell TinsleyTee Higgins
Target share leadersBelow the minimum (at least 10 targets in at least 2 games)#23of 103 wide receivers
Air-yards share leadersBelow the minimum (at least 10 targets in at least 2 games)#9of 103 wide receivers
Red-zone share leadersBelow the minimum (at least 3 red-zone opportunities in at least 2 games)Below the minimum (at least 3 red-zone opportunities in at least 2 games)
Red-zone opportunity leaders#56of 180 wide receivers#81of 180 wide receivers
End-zone target leaders#90of 180 wide receivers#95of 180 wide receivers
Expected fantasy points leadersEst.#15of 180 wide receivers#16of 180 wide receivers

Talking points

Fact-checked notes from the weekly usage report, with the numbers behind them.

Mitchell Tinsley

No talking points for him in this week's report.

Tee Higgins

Role down

Tee Higgins's target share fell to 13% in week 5 (4 targets), from 25% in weeks 1-4.

Target share, week 5
13%
Targets, week 5
4
Target share, weeks 1–4
25%
Targets, weeks 1–4
39

Weeks 1–5 · 5 games

  • Share of team targets/carries in games he played. Snap counts aren't in FFO's licensed data, so a low earlier share can mean limited playing time.

Keep exploring