Fantasy FootballOutsiders

Usage comparison · Tight ends

David Njoku vs Gavin Bartholomew

David Njoku gets more of his team's passes (15% vs 11%) and more of the deep throws (10% of its air yards vs 7%). Near the end zone, they have had the same number of chances (1 play within 20 yards), but David Njoku gets a bigger share of his team's chances there (7% vs 5%). David Njoku is scoring more fantasy points a game (6.4 vs 4.9, PPR), and his chances usually score more too: 6.4 vs 6.0 expected points a game Est..

2026 season · Weeks 1–6 · Updated Oct 16, 2026

TELAC

David Njoku
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
6.4
Expected points per gameEst.
6.4

2 games with a target, carry or dropback

TEMIN

Gavin Bartholomew
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
4.9
Expected points per gameEst.
6.0

2 games with a target, carry or dropback

Side by side

Season totals through week 5. Shares are of each player's team totals in the games he played. For counts and shares, the bigger number is in bold and the bars grow from the centre line.
David Njoku and Gavin Bartholomew, season usage side by side
StatDavid NjokuGavin Bartholomew
Games22
Passes thrown to him
Targets87
Target share15%11%
Air-yards share10%7%
Catches66
Receiving yards6737
Near the end zone
Red-zone chances11
Red-zone share7%5%
End-zone targets00
Touchdowns
Touchdowns00
Expected touchdownsEst.0.20.5
Fantasy points
Fantasy points per game (PPR)6.44.9
Fantasy points (PPR)12.79.7
Expected points per gameEst.6.46.0
Points vs expectedEst.0.0−1.1

Week by week

Each bar is one game. Pick a stat to compare.

Target share by week

Out of all the passes his team threw in his games, the part thrown to him.

  • David Njoku
  • Gavin Bartholomew

— no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Target share by week
WeekDavid NjokuGavin Bartholomew
119%against ARI— no game with a target, carry or dropback
212%against LV— no game with a target, carry or dropback
3— no game with a target, carry or dropback— no game with a target, carry or dropback
4— no game with a target, carry or dropback3%against MIA
5— no game with a target, carry or dropback21%against NO
6— no game with a target, carry or dropback— no game with a target, carry or dropback

Next to each number: that week's opponent. — no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Where they rank

Each player's place among players at his position who meet the leaderboard's minimum. Open a leaderboard for the full list.
Leaderboard ranks for David Njoku and Gavin Bartholomew
LeaderboardDavid NjokuGavin Bartholomew
Target share leadersBelow the minimum (at least 10 targets in at least 2 games)Below the minimum (at least 10 targets in at least 2 games)
Air-yards share leadersBelow the minimum (at least 10 targets in at least 2 games)Below the minimum (at least 10 targets in at least 2 games)
Red-zone share leadersBelow the minimum (at least 3 red-zone opportunities in at least 2 games)Below the minimum (at least 3 red-zone opportunities in at least 2 games)
Red-zone opportunity leaders#51of 101 tight ends#56of 101 tight ends
End-zone target leaders#64of 101 tight ends#71of 101 tight ends
Expected fantasy points leadersEst.#32of 101 tight ends#35of 101 tight ends

Talking points

Fact-checked notes from the weekly usage report, with the numbers behind them.

David Njoku

No talking points for him in this week's report.

Gavin Bartholomew

Role up

Gavin Bartholomew's target share rose to 21% in week 5 (6 targets), from 3% in week 4.

Target share, week 5
21%
Targets, week 5
6
Target share, week 4
3%
Targets, week 4
1

Weeks 4–5 · 2 games

  • Share of team targets/carries in games he played. Snap counts aren't in FFO's licensed data, so a low earlier share can mean limited playing time.

Keep exploring

David Njoku

More comparisons

Gavin Bartholomew

More comparisons

Compare two other players →