Usage comparison · Tight ends
David Njoku vs Teagan Quitoriano
David Njoku gets more of his team's passes (15% vs 4%) and more of the deep throws (10% of its air yards vs 3%). David Njoku has played 2 games and Teagan Quitoriano 1 game. Near the end zone, Teagan Quitoriano has had more chances (2 vs 1 plays within 20 yards) and a bigger share of his team's chances there (17% vs 7%). Teagan Quitoriano is scoring more fantasy points a game (15.5 vs 6.4, PPR), but the chances David Njoku gets usually score more: 6.4 vs 6.2 expected points a game Est..
2026 season · Weeks 1–5 · Updated Oct 12, 2026
TELAC
David Njoku- Fantasy points per game (PPR)
- 6.4
- Expected points per gameEst.
- 6.4
2 games with a target, carry or dropback
TEARI
Teagan Quitoriano- Fantasy points per game (PPR)
- 15.5
- Expected points per gameEst.
- 6.2
1 game with a target, carry or dropback
Side by side
| Stat | David Njoku | Teagan Quitoriano |
|---|---|---|
| Games | 2 | 1 |
| Passes thrown to him | ||
| Targets | 8 | 2 |
| Target share | 15% | 4% |
| Air-yards share | 10% | 3% |
| Catches | 6 | 2 |
| Receiving yards | 67 | 15 |
| Near the end zone | ||
| Red-zone chances | 1 | 2 |
| Red-zone share | 7% | 17% |
| End-zone targets | 0 | 2 |
| Touchdowns | ||
| Touchdowns | 0 | 2 |
| Expected touchdownsEst. | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Fantasy points | ||
| Fantasy points per game (PPR) | 6.4 | 15.5 |
| Fantasy points (PPR) | 12.7 | 15.5 |
| Expected points per gameEst. | 6.4 | 6.2 |
| Points vs expectedEst. | 0.0 | +9.3 |
Week by week
Target share by week
Out of all the passes his team threw in his games, the part thrown to him.
- David Njoku
- Teagan Quitoriano
— no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.
| Week | David Njoku | Teagan Quitoriano |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 19%against ARI | — no game with a target, carry or dropback |
| 2 | 12%against LV | — no game with a target, carry or dropback |
| 3 | — no game with a target, carry or dropback | — no game with a target, carry or dropback |
| 4 | — no game with a target, carry or dropback | — no game with a target, carry or dropback |
| 5 | — no game with a target, carry or dropback | 4%against DET |
Next to each number: that week's opponent. — no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.
Where they rank
| Leaderboard | David Njoku | Teagan Quitoriano |
|---|---|---|
| Target share leaders | Below the minimum (at least 10 targets in at least 2 games) | Below the minimum (at least 10 targets in at least 2 games) |
| Air-yards share leaders | Below the minimum (at least 10 targets in at least 2 games) | Below the minimum (at least 10 targets in at least 2 games) |
| Red-zone share leaders | Below the minimum (at least 3 red-zone opportunities in at least 2 games) | Below the minimum (at least 3 red-zone opportunities in at least 2 games) |
| Red-zone opportunity leaders | #51of 101 tight ends | #42of 101 tight ends |
| End-zone target leaders | #64of 101 tight ends | #21of 101 tight ends |
| Expected fantasy points leadersEst. | #32of 101 tight ends | #33of 101 tight ends |
Keep exploring
David Njoku
More comparisons
Teagan Quitoriano
More comparisons