Usage comparison · Tight ends

Chig Okonkwo vs David Njoku

Chig Okonkwo gets more of the deep throws (11% of his team's air yards vs 10%), and they get the same share of their teams' passes (15%). Chig Okonkwo has played 3 games and David Njoku 2 games. Near the end zone, David Njoku has had more chances (1 vs 0 plays within 20 yards) and a bigger share of his team's chances there (7% vs 0%). David Njoku is scoring more fantasy points a game (6.4 vs 5.4, PPR), but the chances Chig Okonkwo gets usually score more: 6.7 vs 6.4 expected points a game Est..

2026 season · Weeks 1–5 · Updated Oct 12, 2026

TEWAS

Chig Okonkwo
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
5.4
Expected points per gameEst.
6.7

3 games with a target, carry or dropback

TELAC

David Njoku
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
6.4
Expected points per gameEst.
6.4

2 games with a target, carry or dropback

Side by side

Season totals through week 4. Shares are of each player's team totals in the games he played. For counts and shares, the bigger number is in bold and the bars grow from the centre line.
Chig Okonkwo and David Njoku, season usage side by side
StatChig OkonkwoDavid Njoku
Games32
Passes thrown to him
Targets138
Target share15%15%
Air-yards share11%10%
Catches86
Receiving yards8167
Near the end zone
Red-zone chances01
Red-zone share0%7%
End-zone targets00
Touchdowns
Touchdowns00
Expected touchdownsEst.0.10.2
Fantasy points
Fantasy points per game (PPR)5.46.4
Fantasy points (PPR)16.112.7
Expected points per gameEst.6.76.4
Points vs expectedEst.−1.40.0

Week by week

Each bar is one game. Pick a stat to compare.

Target share by week

Out of all the passes his team threw in his games, the part thrown to him.

  • Chig Okonkwo
  • David Njoku

— no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Target share by week
WeekChig OkonkwoDavid Njoku
110%against PHI19%against ARI
2— no game with a target, carry or dropback12%against LV
3— no game with a target, carry or dropback— no game with a target, carry or dropback
411%against IND— no game with a target, carry or dropback
526%against NYG— no game with a target, carry or dropback

Next to each number: that week's opponent. — no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Where they rank

Each player's place among players at his position who meet the leaderboard's minimum. Open a leaderboard for the full list.
Leaderboard ranks for Chig Okonkwo and David Njoku
LeaderboardChig OkonkwoDavid Njoku
Target share leaders#22of 38 tight endsBelow the minimum (at least 10 targets in at least 2 games)
Air-yards share leaders#23of 38 tight endsBelow the minimum (at least 10 targets in at least 2 games)
Red-zone share leadersBelow the minimum (at least 3 red-zone opportunities in at least 2 games)Below the minimum (at least 3 red-zone opportunities in at least 2 games)
Red-zone opportunity leaders#76of 101 tight ends#51of 101 tight ends
End-zone target leaders#60of 101 tight ends#64of 101 tight ends
Expected fantasy points leadersEst.#30of 101 tight ends#32of 101 tight ends

Talking points

Fact-checked notes from the weekly usage report, with the numbers behind them.

Chig Okonkwo

Role up

Chig Okonkwo's target share rose to 26% in week 5 (6 targets), from 11% in weeks 1-4.

Target share, week 5
26%
Targets, week 5
6
Target share, weeks 1 and 4
11%
Targets, weeks 1 and 4
7

Weeks 1 and 4–5 · 3 games

  • Share of team targets/carries in games he played. Snap counts aren't in FFO's licensed data, so a low earlier share can mean limited playing time.

David Njoku

No talking points for him in this week's report.

Keep exploring