Usage comparison · Tight ends

Dallas Goedert vs Travis Kelce

Travis Kelce gets more of his team's passes (19% vs 17%) and more of the deep throws (15% of its air yards vs 12%). Dallas Goedert has played 3 games and Travis Kelce 4 games. Near the end zone, they have had the same number of chances (2 plays within 20 yards), but Dallas Goedert gets a bigger share of his team's chances there (10% vs 4%). Travis Kelce is scoring more fantasy points a game (13.2 vs 11.6, PPR), and his chances usually score more too: 8.7 vs 8.4 expected points a game Est..

2026 season · Weeks 1–5 · Updated Oct 12, 2026

TEPHI

Dallas Goedert
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
11.6
Expected points per gameEst.
8.4

3 games with a target, carry or dropback

TEKC

Travis Kelce
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
13.2
Expected points per gameEst.
8.7

4 games with a target, carry or dropback

Side by side

Season totals through week 4. Shares are of each player's team totals in the games he played. For counts and shares, the bigger number is in bold and the bars grow from the centre line.
Dallas Goedert and Travis Kelce, season usage side by side
StatDallas GoedertTravis Kelce
Games34
Passes thrown to him
Targets1622
Target share17%19%
Air-yards share12%15%
Catches1116
Receiving yards119246
Near the end zone
Red-zone chances22
Red-zone share10%4%
End-zone targets11
Touchdowns
Touchdowns22
Expected touchdownsEst.0.50.7
Fantasy points
Fantasy points per game (PPR)11.613.2
Fantasy points (PPR)34.952.6
Expected points per gameEst.8.48.7
Points vs expectedEst.+3.2+4.4

Week by week

Each bar is one game. Pick a stat to compare.

Target share by week

Out of all the passes his team threw in his games, the part thrown to him.

  • Dallas Goedert
  • Travis Kelce

— no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Target share by week
WeekDallas GoedertTravis Kelce
123%against WAS20%against DEN
26%against TEN26%against IND
3— no game with a target, carry or dropback9%against MIA
4— no game with a target, carry or dropback15%against LV
524%against JAX— no game with a target, carry or dropback

Next to each number: that week's opponent. — no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Where they rank

Each player's place among players at his position who meet the leaderboard's minimum. Open a leaderboard for the full list.
Leaderboard ranks for Dallas Goedert and Travis Kelce
LeaderboardDallas GoedertTravis Kelce
Target share leaders#14of 38 tight ends#10of 38 tight ends
Air-yards share leaders#17of 38 tight ends#13of 38 tight ends
Red-zone share leadersBelow the minimum (at least 3 red-zone opportunities in at least 2 games)Below the minimum (at least 3 red-zone opportunities in at least 2 games)
Red-zone opportunity leaders#31of 101 tight ends#43of 101 tight ends
End-zone target leaders#27of 101 tight ends#47of 101 tight ends
Expected fantasy points leadersEst.#18of 101 tight ends#16of 101 tight ends

Talking points

Fact-checked notes from the weekly usage report, with the numbers behind them.

Dallas Goedert

Role up

Dallas Goedert's target share rose to 24% in week 5 (9 targets), from 13% in weeks 1-2.

Target share, week 5
24%
Targets, week 5
9
Target share, weeks 1–2
13%
Targets, weeks 1–2
7

Weeks 1–2 and 5 · 3 games

  • Share of team targets/carries in games he played. Snap counts aren't in FFO's licensed data, so a low earlier share can mean limited playing time.

Touchdowns above usage

Dallas Goedert has scored 2 touchdowns on opportunities that usually produce 0.5, per FFO's expected-points model.

Touchdowns
2
Expected touchdownsEst.
0.5
Expected PPR per gameEst.
8.4
PPR vs expected, per gameEst.
+3.2

Weeks 1–2 and 5 · 3 games

  • Model estimate, not a forecast: v1 predicts about as well as raw points.

Travis Kelce

No talking points for him in this week's report.

Keep exploring