Usage comparison · Tight ends

Cade Otton vs Dallas Goedert

Cade Otton gets more of his team's passes (18% vs 17%) and more of the deep throws (16% of its air yards vs 12%). Cade Otton has played 5 games and Dallas Goedert 3 games. Near the end zone, they have had the same number of chances (2 plays within 20 yards), but Dallas Goedert gets a bigger share of his team's chances there (10% vs 4%). Dallas Goedert is scoring more fantasy points a game (11.6 vs 7.2, PPR), and his chances usually score more too: 8.4 vs 8.3 expected points a game Est..

2026 season · Weeks 1–5 · Updated Oct 12, 2026

TETB

Cade Otton

Fantasy points per game (PPR): 7.2
Expected points per gameEst.: 8.3

5 games with a target, carry or dropback

TEPHI

Dallas Goedert

Fantasy points per game (PPR): 11.6
Expected points per gameEst.: 8.4

3 games with a target, carry or dropback

Side by side

Season totals through week 4. Shares are of each player's team totals in the games he played. For counts and shares, the bigger number is in bold and the bars grow from the centre line.

Cade Otton and Dallas Goedert, season usage side by side
Stat	Cade Otton	Dallas Goedert
Games	5	3
Passes thrown to him
Targets	27	16
Target share	18%	17%
Air-yards share	16%	12%
Catches	18	11
Receiving yards	182	119
Near the end zone
Red-zone chances	2	2
Red-zone share	4%	10%
End-zone targets	0	1
Touchdowns
Touchdowns	0	2
Expected touchdownsEst.	0.3	0.5
Fantasy points
Fantasy points per game (PPR)	7.2	11.6
Fantasy points (PPR)	36.2	34.9
Expected points per gameEst.	8.3	8.4
Points vs expectedEst.	−1.1	+3.2

Week by week

Each bar is one game. Pick a stat to compare.

Target share by week

Out of all the passes his team threw in his games, the part thrown to him.

Cade Otton
Dallas Goedert

— no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Target share by week
Week	Cade Otton	Dallas Goedert
1	19%against CIN	23%against WAS
2	18%against CLE	6%against TEN
3	17%against MIN	— no game with a target, carry or dropback
4	23%against GB	— no game with a target, carry or dropback
5	16%against DAL	24%against JAX

Next to each number: that week's opponent. — no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Where they rank

Each player's place among players at his position who meet the leaderboard's minimum. Open a leaderboard for the full list.

Leaderboard ranks for Cade Otton and Dallas Goedert
Leaderboard	Cade Otton	Dallas Goedert
Target share leaders	#11of 38 tight ends	#14of 38 tight ends
Air-yards share leaders	#10of 38 tight ends	#17of 38 tight ends
Red-zone share leaders	Below the minimum (at least 3 red-zone opportunities in at least 2 games)	Below the minimum (at least 3 red-zone opportunities in at least 2 games)
Red-zone opportunity leaders	#29of 101 tight ends	#31of 101 tight ends
End-zone target leaders	#56of 101 tight ends	#27of 101 tight ends
Expected fantasy points leadersEst.	#19of 101 tight ends	#18of 101 tight ends

Talking points

Fact-checked notes from the weekly usage report, with the numbers behind them.

Cade Otton

No talking points for him in this week's report.

Dallas Goedert

Role up

Dallas Goedert's target share rose to 24% in week 5 (9 targets), from 13% in weeks 1-2.

Target share, week 5: 24%
Targets, week 5: 9
Target share, weeks 1–2: 13%
Targets, weeks 1–2: 7

Weeks 1–2 and 5 · 3 games

Share of team targets/carries in games he played. Snap counts aren't in FFO's licensed data, so a low earlier share can mean limited playing time.

Touchdowns above usage

Dallas Goedert has scored 2 touchdowns on opportunities that usually produce 0.5, per FFO's expected-points model.

Touchdowns: 2
Expected touchdownsEst.: 0.5
Expected PPR per gameEst.: 8.4
PPR vs expected, per gameEst.: +3.2

Weeks 1–2 and 5 · 3 games

Model estimate, not a forecast: v1 predicts about as well as raw points.

Keep exploring

Cade Otton

More comparisons

Dallas Goedert

More comparisons

Compare two other players →