Usage comparison · Tight ends

Colston Loveland vs Dallas Goedert

Colston Loveland gets more of his team's passes (19% vs 18%) and more of the deep throws (17% of its air yards vs 13%). Colston Loveland has played 7 games and Dallas Goedert 5 games. Near the end zone, Colston Loveland has had more chances (10 vs 3 plays within 20 yards) and a bigger share of his team's chances there (10% vs 9%). Dallas Goedert is scoring more fantasy points a game (11.4 vs 8.9, PPR), but the chances Colston Loveland gets usually score more: 10.6 vs 9.5 expected points a game Est..

2026 season · Weeks 1–7 · Updated Oct 27, 2026

TECHI

Colston Loveland
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
8.9
Expected points per gameEst.
10.6

7 games with a target, carry or dropback

TEPHI

Dallas Goedert
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
11.4
Expected points per gameEst.
9.5

5 games with a target, carry or dropback

Side by side

Season totals through week 7. Shares are of each player's team totals in the games he played. For counts and shares, the bigger number is in bold and the bars grow from the centre line.
Colston Loveland and Dallas Goedert, season usage side by side
StatColston LovelandDallas Goedert
Games75
Passes thrown to him
Targets4231
Target share19%18%
Air-yards share17%13%
Catches2622
Receiving yards244228
Near the end zone
Red-zone chances103
Red-zone share10%9%
End-zone targets41
Touchdowns
Touchdowns22
Expected touchdownsEst.2.70.6
Fantasy points
Fantasy points per game (PPR)8.911.4
Fantasy points (PPR)62.456.8
Expected points per gameEst.10.69.5
Points vs expectedEst.−1.7+1.8

Week by week

Each bar is one game. Pick a stat to compare.

Target share by week

Out of all the passes his team threw in his games, the part thrown to him.

  • Colston Loveland
  • Dallas Goedert

— no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Target share by week
WeekColston LovelandDallas Goedert
18%against CAR23%against WAS
210%against MIN6%against TEN
312%against PHI— no game with a target, carry or dropback
429%against NYJ— no game with a target, carry or dropback
513%against GB24%against JAX
621%against ATL18%against CAR
740%against NE21%against DAL

Next to each number: that week's opponent. — no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Where they rank

Each player's place among players at his position who meet the leaderboard's minimum. Open a leaderboard for the full list.
Leaderboard ranks for Colston Loveland and Dallas Goedert
LeaderboardColston LovelandDallas Goedert
Target share leaders#9of 52 tight ends#13of 52 tight ends
Air-yards share leaders#9of 52 tight ends#17of 52 tight ends
Red-zone share leaders#18of 39 tight ends#20of 39 tight ends
Red-zone opportunity leaders#3of 109 tight ends#31of 109 tight ends
End-zone target leaders#6of 109 tight ends#38of 109 tight ends
Expected fantasy points leadersEst.#8of 109 tight ends#10of 109 tight ends

Talking points

Fact-checked notes from the weekly usage report, with the numbers behind them.

Colston Loveland

Role up

Colston Loveland's target share rose to 40% in week 7 (12 targets), from 15% in weeks 1-6.

Target share, week 7
40%
Targets, week 7
12
Target share, weeks 1–6
15%
Targets, weeks 1–6
30

Weeks 1–7 · 7 games

  • Share of team targets/carries in games he played. Snap counts aren't in FFO's licensed data, so a low earlier share can mean limited playing time.

Dallas Goedert

No talking points for him in this week's report.

Keep exploring