Usage comparison · Tight ends

Colston Loveland vs Tucker Kraft

Colston Loveland gets more of his team's passes (19% vs 17%) and more of the deep throws (17% of its air yards vs 9%). Colston Loveland has played 7 games and Tucker Kraft 6 games. Near the end zone, Colston Loveland has had more chances (10 vs 7 plays within 20 yards), but Tucker Kraft gets a bigger share of his team's chances there (11% vs 10%). Tucker Kraft is scoring more fantasy points a game (9.4 vs 8.9, PPR), and his chances usually score more too: 10.7 vs 10.6 expected points a game Est..

2026 season · Weeks 1–7 · Updated Oct 23, 2026

TECHI

Colston Loveland
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
8.9
Expected points per gameEst.
10.6

7 games with a target, carry or dropback

TEGB

Tucker Kraft
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
9.4
Expected points per gameEst.
10.7

6 games with a target, carry or dropback

Side by side

Season totals through week 6. Shares are of each player's team totals in the games he played. For counts and shares, the bigger number is in bold and the bars grow from the centre line.
Colston Loveland and Tucker Kraft, season usage side by side
StatColston LovelandTucker Kraft
Games76
Passes thrown to him
Targets4237
Target share19%17%
Air-yards share17%9%
Catches2625
Receiving yards244249
Near the end zone
Red-zone chances107
Red-zone share10%11%
End-zone targets42
Touchdowns
Touchdowns21
Expected touchdownsEst.2.72.1
Fantasy points
Fantasy points per game (PPR)8.99.4
Fantasy points (PPR)62.456.4
Expected points per gameEst.10.610.7
Points vs expectedEst.−1.7−1.3

Week by week

Each bar is one game. Pick a stat to compare.

Target share by week

Out of all the passes his team threw in his games, the part thrown to him.

  • Colston Loveland
  • Tucker Kraft

— no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Target share by week
WeekColston LovelandTucker Kraft
18%against CAR15%against MIN
210%against MIN10%against NYJ
312%against PHI16%against ATL
429%against NYJ23%against TB
513%against GB16%against CHI
621%against ATL20%against DAL
740%against NE— no game with a target, carry or dropback

Next to each number: that week's opponent. — no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Where they rank

Each player's place among players at his position who meet the leaderboard's minimum. Open a leaderboard for the full list.
Leaderboard ranks for Colston Loveland and Tucker Kraft
LeaderboardColston LovelandTucker Kraft
Target share leaders#9of 47 tight ends#16of 47 tight ends
Air-yards share leaders#7of 47 tight ends#29of 47 tight ends
Red-zone share leaders#19of 35 tight ends#13of 35 tight ends
Red-zone opportunity leaders#2of 104 tight ends#9of 104 tight ends
End-zone target leaders#6of 104 tight ends#28of 104 tight ends
Expected fantasy points leadersEst.#9of 104 tight ends#8of 104 tight ends

Talking points

Fact-checked notes from the weekly usage report, with the numbers behind them.

Colston Loveland

Role up

Colston Loveland's target share rose to 40% in week 7 (12 targets), from 15% in weeks 1-6.

Target share, week 7
40%
Targets, week 7
12
Target share, weeks 1–6
15%
Targets, weeks 1–6
30

Weeks 1–7 · 7 games

  • Share of team targets/carries in games he played. Snap counts aren't in FFO's licensed data, so a low earlier share can mean limited playing time.

Tucker Kraft

No talking points for him in this week's report.

Keep exploring