Usage comparison · Wide receivers

CeeDee Lamb vs Davante Adams

CeeDee Lamb gets more of his team's passes (27% vs 21%), and they get the same share of their teams' air yards (37%). Near the end zone, Davante Adams has had more chances (7 vs 6 plays within 20 yards) and a bigger share of his team's chances there (13% vs 11%). CeeDee Lamb is scoring more fantasy points a game (23.0 vs 19.0, PPR), and his chances usually score more too: 18.6 vs 17.2 expected points a game Est..

2026 season · Weeks 1–6 · Updated Oct 16, 2026

WRDAL

CeeDee Lamb
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
23.0
Expected points per gameEst.
18.6

5 games with a target, carry or dropback

WRLA

Davante Adams
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
19.0
Expected points per gameEst.
17.2

5 games with a target, carry or dropback

Side by side

Season totals through week 5. Shares are of each player's team totals in the games he played. For counts and shares, the bigger number is in bold and the bars grow from the centre line.
CeeDee Lamb and Davante Adams, season usage side by side
StatCeeDee LambDavante Adams
Games55
Passes thrown to him
Targets5145
Target share27%21%
Air-yards share37%37%
Catches3927
Receiving yards507441
Near the end zone
Red-zone chances67
Red-zone share11%13%
End-zone targets56
Touchdowns
Touchdowns44
Expected touchdownsEst.3.13.1
Fantasy points
Fantasy points per game (PPR)23.019.0
Fantasy points (PPR)115.195.1
Expected points per gameEst.18.617.2
Points vs expectedEst.+4.1+1.9

Week by week

Each bar is one game. Pick a stat to compare.

Target share by week

Out of all the passes his team threw in his games, the part thrown to him.

  • CeeDee Lamb
  • Davante Adams

— no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Target share by week
WeekCeeDee LambDavante Adams
127%against NYG22%against SF
229%against WAS33%against NYG
320%against BAL27%against DEN
449%against HOU18%against PHI
512%against TB13%against BUF
6— no game with a target, carry or dropback— no game with a target, carry or dropback

Next to each number: that week's opponent. — no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Where they rank

Each player's place among players at his position who meet the leaderboard's minimum. Open a leaderboard for the full list.
Leaderboard ranks for CeeDee Lamb and Davante Adams
LeaderboardCeeDee LambDavante Adams
Target share leaders#11of 103 wide receivers#30of 103 wide receivers
Air-yards share leaders#17of 103 wide receivers#15of 103 wide receivers
Red-zone share leaders#27of 61 wide receivers#17of 61 wide receivers
Red-zone opportunity leaders#9of 181 wide receivers#7of 181 wide receivers
End-zone target leaders#6of 181 wide receivers#3of 181 wide receivers
Expected fantasy points leadersEst.#7of 181 wide receivers#8of 181 wide receivers

Talking points

Fact-checked notes from the weekly usage report, with the numbers behind them.

CeeDee Lamb

Role down

CeeDee Lamb's target share fell to 12% in week 5 (5 targets), from 32% in weeks 1-4.

Target share, week 5
12%
Targets, week 5
5
Target share, weeks 1–4
32%
Targets, weeks 1–4
46

Weeks 1–5 · 5 games

  • Share of team targets/carries in games he played. Snap counts aren't in FFO's licensed data, so a low earlier share can mean limited playing time.

Davante Adams

Role down

Davante Adams's target share fell to 13% in week 5 (7 targets), from 24% in weeks 1-4.

Target share, week 5
13%
Targets, week 5
7
Target share, weeks 1–4
24%
Targets, weeks 1–4
38

Weeks 1–5 · 5 games

  • Share of team targets/carries in games he played. Snap counts aren't in FFO's licensed data, so a low earlier share can mean limited playing time.

Keep exploring