Usage comparison · Wide receivers
CeeDee Lamb gets more of his team's passes (32% vs 29%), while Chris Olave gets more of the deep throws (47% of his team's air yards vs 43%). CeeDee Lamb has played 4 games and Chris Olave 3 games. Near the end zone, CeeDee Lamb has had more chances (6 vs 4 plays within 20 yards) and a bigger share of his team's chances there (13% vs 12%). CeeDee Lamb is scoring more fantasy points a game (28.1 vs 23.5, PPR), but the chances Chris Olave gets usually score more: 21.5 vs 21.2 expected points a game Est..
2026 season · Weeks 1–4 · Updated Oct 5, 2026
WRDAL
CeeDee Lamb4 games with a target, carry or dropback
WRNO
Chris Olave3 games with a target, carry or dropback
| Stat | CeeDee Lamb | Chris Olave |
|---|---|---|
| Games | 4 | 3 |
| Passes thrown to him | ||
| Targets | 46 | 36 |
| Target share | 32% | 29% |
| Air-yards share | 43% | 47% |
| Catches | 37 | 27 |
| Receiving yards | 498 | 375 |
| Near the end zone | ||
| Red-zone chances | 6 | 4 |
| Red-zone share | 13% | 12% |
| End-zone targets | 5 | 2 |
| Touchdowns | ||
| Touchdowns | 4 | 1 |
| Expected touchdownsEst. | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| Fantasy points | ||
| Fantasy points per game (PPR) | 28.1 | 23.5 |
| Fantasy points (PPR) | 112.2 | 70.5 |
| Expected points per gameEst. | 21.2 | 21.5 |
| Points vs expectedEst. | +6.4 | +2.0 |
Target share by week
Out of all the passes his team threw in his games, the part thrown to him.
— no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.
| Week | CeeDee Lamb | Chris Olave |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 27%against NYG | 25%against DET |
| 2 | 29%against WAS | 31%against BAL |
| 3 | 20%against BAL | 33%against LV |
| 4 | 49%against HOU | — no game with a target, carry or dropback |
Next to each number: that week's opponent. — no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.
| Leaderboard | CeeDee Lamb | Chris Olave |
|---|---|---|
| Target share leaders | #3of 96 wide receivers | #7of 96 wide receivers |
| Air-yards share leaders | #9of 96 wide receivers | #6of 96 wide receivers |
| Red-zone share leaders | #14of 47 wide receivers | #19of 47 wide receivers |
| Red-zone opportunity leaders | #6of 174 wide receivers | #15of 174 wide receivers |
| End-zone target leaders | #3of 174 wide receivers | #27of 174 wide receivers |
| Expected fantasy points leadersEst. | #3of 174 wide receivers | #1of 174 wide receivers |
Role up
Weeks 1–4 · 4 games
No talking points for him in this week's report.
CeeDee Lamb
More comparisons