Usage comparison · Wide receivers

Antonio Williams vs Rashee Rice

Rashee Rice gets more of his team's passes (19% vs 15%) and more of the deep throws (23% of its air yards vs 16%). In total, though, Antonio Williams has more targets (19 vs 17). Antonio Williams has played 4 games and Rashee Rice 3 games. Near the end zone, Rashee Rice has had more chances (4 vs 2 plays within 20 yards) and a bigger share of his team's chances there (10% vs 6%). Rashee Rice is scoring more fantasy points a game (12.7 vs 7.6, PPR), and his chances usually score more too: 9.0 vs 8.6 expected points a game Est..

2026 season · Weeks 1–4 · Updated Oct 5, 2026

WRWASRookie

Antonio Williams
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
7.6
Expected points per gameEst.
8.6

4 games with a target, carry or dropback

WRKC

Rashee Rice
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
12.7
Expected points per gameEst.
9.0

3 games with a target, carry or dropback

Side by side

Season totals through week 3. Shares are of each player's team totals in the games he played. For counts and shares, the bigger number is in bold and the bars grow from the centre line.
Antonio Williams and Rashee Rice, season usage side by side
StatAntonio WilliamsRashee Rice
Games43
Passes thrown to him
Targets1917
Target share15%19%
Air-yards share16%23%
Catches1213
Receiving yards124190
Near the end zone
Red-zone chances24
Red-zone share6%10%
End-zone targets10
Touchdowns
Touchdowns11
Expected touchdownsEst.1.00.3
Fantasy points
Fantasy points per game (PPR)7.612.7
Fantasy points (PPR)30.438.0
Expected points per gameEst.8.69.0
Points vs expectedEst.−1.0+3.6

Week by week

Each bar is one game. Pick a stat to compare.

Target share by week

Out of all the passes his team threw in his games, the part thrown to him.

  • Antonio Williams
  • Rashee Rice

— no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Target share by week
WeekAntonio WilliamsRashee Rice
114%against PHI8%against DEN
29%against DAL14%against IND
313%against SEA39%against MIA
422%against IND— no game with a target, carry or dropback

Next to each number: that week's opponent. — no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Where they rank

Each player's place among players at his position who meet the leaderboard's minimum. Open a leaderboard for the full list.
Leaderboard ranks for Antonio Williams and Rashee Rice
LeaderboardAntonio WilliamsRashee Rice
Target share leaders#62of 96 wide receivers#43of 96 wide receivers
Air-yards share leaders#71of 96 wide receivers#53of 96 wide receivers
Red-zone share leadersBelow the minimum (at least 3 red-zone opportunities in at least 2 games)#32of 47 wide receivers
Red-zone opportunity leaders#49of 174 wide receivers#26of 174 wide receivers
End-zone target leaders#48of 174 wide receivers#162of 174 wide receivers
Expected fantasy points leadersEst.#59of 174 wide receivers#57of 174 wide receivers

Talking points

Fact-checked notes from the weekly usage report, with the numbers behind them.

Antonio Williams

Role up

Antonio Williams's target share rose to 22% in week 4 (8 targets), from 12% in weeks 1-3.

Target share, week 4
22%
Targets, week 4
8
Target share, weeks 1–3
12%
Targets, weeks 1–3
11

Weeks 1–4 · 4 games

  • Share of team targets/carries in games he played. Snap counts aren't in FFO's licensed data, so a low earlier share can mean limited playing time.

Rashee Rice

Role up

Rashee Rice's target share rose to 39% in week 3 (9 targets), from 12% in weeks 1-2.

Target share, week 3
39%
Targets, week 3
9
Target share, weeks 1–2
12%
Targets, weeks 1–2
8

Weeks 1–3 · 3 games

  • Share of team targets/carries in games he played. Snap counts aren't in FFO's licensed data, so a low earlier share can mean limited playing time.

Keep exploring