Usage comparison · Tight ends

Pat Freiermuth vs T.J. Hockenson

T.J. Hockenson gets more of his team's passes (21% vs 13%) and more of the deep throws (19% of its air yards vs 14%). In total, though, Pat Freiermuth has more targets (29 vs 27). Pat Freiermuth has played 6 games and T.J. Hockenson 5 games. Near the end zone, they have had the same number of chances (5 plays within 20 yards), but T.J. Hockenson gets a bigger share of his team's chances there (14% vs 13%). Pat Freiermuth is scoring more fantasy points a game (10.6 vs 9.8, PPR), though their chances usually score the same: 9.0 expected points a game Est..

2026 season · Weeks 1–6 · Updated Oct 19, 2026

TEPIT

Pat Freiermuth
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
10.6
Expected points per gameEst.
9.0

6 games with a target, carry or dropback

Week 6 injury report: Questionable (Calf)

TEMIN

T.J. Hockenson
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
9.8
Expected points per gameEst.
9.0

5 games with a target, carry or dropback

Side by side

Season totals through week 5. Shares are of each player's team totals in the games he played. For counts and shares, the bigger number is in bold and the bars grow from the centre line.
Pat Freiermuth and T.J. Hockenson, season usage side by side
StatPat FreiermuthT.J. Hockenson
Games65
Passes thrown to him
Targets2927
Target share13%21%
Air-yards share14%19%
Catches2123
Receiving yards180202
Near the end zone
Red-zone chances55
Red-zone share13%14%
End-zone targets31
Touchdowns
Touchdowns41
Expected touchdownsEst.2.01.1
Fantasy points
Fantasy points per game (PPR)10.69.8
Fantasy points (PPR)63.449.2
Expected points per gameEst.9.09.0
Points vs expectedEst.+1.5+0.8

Week by week

Each bar is one game. Pick a stat to compare.

Target share by week

Out of all the passes his team threw in his games, the part thrown to him.

  • Pat Freiermuth
  • T.J. Hockenson

— no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Target share by week
WeekPat FreiermuthT.J. Hockenson
114%against ATL22%against GB
214%against NE21%against CHI
313%against CIN16%against TB
413%against CLE39%against MIA
523%against IND3%against NO
67%against TB— no game with a target, carry or dropback

Next to each number: that week's opponent. — no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Where they rank

Each player's place among players at his position who meet the leaderboard's minimum. Open a leaderboard for the full list.
Leaderboard ranks for Pat Freiermuth and T.J. Hockenson
LeaderboardPat FreiermuthT.J. Hockenson
Target share leaders#28of 47 tight ends#5of 47 tight ends
Air-yards share leaders#13of 47 tight ends#5of 47 tight ends
Red-zone share leaders#6of 35 tight ends#4of 35 tight ends
Red-zone opportunity leaders#18of 104 tight ends#19of 104 tight ends
End-zone target leaders#15of 104 tight ends#47of 104 tight ends
Expected fantasy points leadersEst.#16of 104 tight ends#17of 104 tight ends

Talking points

Fact-checked notes from the weekly usage report, with the numbers behind them.

Pat Freiermuth

Touchdowns above usage

Pat Freiermuth has scored 4 touchdowns on opportunities that usually produce 2.0, per FFO's expected-points model.

Touchdowns
4
Expected touchdownsEst.
2.0
Expected PPR per gameEst.
9.0
PPR vs expected, per gameEst.
+1.5

Weeks 1–6 · 6 games

  • Model estimate, not a forecast: v1 predicts about as well as raw points.

T.J. Hockenson

No talking points for him in this week's report.

Keep exploring