Usage comparison · Tight ends

Nate Adkins vs Teagan Quitoriano

Nate Adkins gets more of his team's passes (8% vs 4%) and more of the deep throws (7% of its air yards vs 3%). Nate Adkins has played 2 games and Teagan Quitoriano 1 game. Near the end zone, Nate Adkins has had more chances (3 vs 2 plays within 20 yards), but Teagan Quitoriano gets a bigger share of his team's chances there (17% vs 11%). Teagan Quitoriano is scoring more fantasy points a game (15.5 vs 10.3, PPR), and his chances usually score more too: 6.2 vs 6.1 expected points a game Est..

2026 season · Weeks 1–5 · Updated Oct 12, 2026

TEDEN

Nate Adkins
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
10.3
Expected points per gameEst.
6.1

2 games with a target, carry or dropback

TEARI

Teagan Quitoriano
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
15.5
Expected points per gameEst.
6.2

1 game with a target, carry or dropback

Side by side

Season totals through week 4. Shares are of each player's team totals in the games he played. For counts and shares, the bigger number is in bold and the bars grow from the centre line.
Nate Adkins and Teagan Quitoriano, season usage side by side
StatNate AdkinsTeagan Quitoriano
Games21
Passes thrown to him
Targets52
Target share8%4%
Air-yards share7%3%
Catches42
Receiving yards4015
Near the end zone
Red-zone chances32
Red-zone share11%17%
End-zone targets12
Touchdowns
Touchdowns22
Expected touchdownsEst.0.90.8
Fantasy points
Fantasy points per game (PPR)10.315.5
Fantasy points (PPR)20.615.5
Expected points per gameEst.6.16.2
Points vs expectedEst.+4.2+9.3

Week by week

Each bar is one game. Pick a stat to compare.

Target share by week

Out of all the passes his team threw in his games, the part thrown to him.

  • Nate Adkins
  • Teagan Quitoriano

— no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Target share by week
WeekNate AdkinsTeagan Quitoriano
1— no game with a target, carry or dropback— no game with a target, carry or dropback
210%against JAX— no game with a target, carry or dropback
36%against LA— no game with a target, carry or dropback
4— no game with a target, carry or dropback— no game with a target, carry or dropback
5— no game with a target, carry or dropback4%against DET

Next to each number: that week's opponent. — no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Where they rank

Each player's place among players at his position who meet the leaderboard's minimum. Open a leaderboard for the full list.
Leaderboard ranks for Nate Adkins and Teagan Quitoriano
LeaderboardNate AdkinsTeagan Quitoriano
Target share leadersBelow the minimum (at least 10 targets in at least 2 games)Below the minimum (at least 10 targets in at least 2 games)
Air-yards share leadersBelow the minimum (at least 10 targets in at least 2 games)Below the minimum (at least 10 targets in at least 2 games)
Red-zone share leaders#15of 28 tight endsBelow the minimum (at least 3 red-zone opportunities in at least 2 games)
Red-zone opportunity leaders#25of 101 tight ends#42of 101 tight ends
End-zone target leaders#41of 101 tight ends#21of 101 tight ends
Expected fantasy points leadersEst.#34of 101 tight ends#33of 101 tight ends

Keep exploring