Fantasy FootballOutsiders

Usage comparison · Wide receivers

Malik Nabers vs Tetairoa McMillan

Malik Nabers gets more of his team's passes (30% vs 26%) and more of the deep throws (35% of its air yards vs 30%). Malik Nabers has played 6 games and Tetairoa McMillan 5 games. Near the end zone, Malik Nabers has had more chances (8 vs 7 plays within 20 yards) and a bigger share of his team's chances there (16% vs 14%). Tetairoa McMillan is scoring more fantasy points a game (17.8 vs 17.1, PPR), but the chances Malik Nabers gets usually score more: 18.6 vs 18.2 expected points a game Est..

2026 season · Weeks 1–6 · Updated Oct 19, 2026

WRNYG

Malik Nabers
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
17.1
Expected points per gameEst.
18.6

6 games with a target, carry or dropback

WRCAR

Tetairoa McMillan
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
17.8
Expected points per gameEst.
18.2

5 games with a target, carry or dropback

Side by side

Season totals through week 5. Shares are of each player's team totals in the games he played. For counts and shares, the bigger number is in bold and the bars grow from the centre line.
Malik Nabers and Tetairoa McMillan, season usage side by side
StatMalik NabersTetairoa McMillan
Games65
Passes thrown to him
Targets6148
Target share30%26%
Air-yards share35%30%
Catches4132
Receiving yards494471
Near the end zone
Red-zone chances87
Red-zone share16%14%
End-zone targets75
Touchdowns
Touchdowns22
Expected touchdownsEst.4.03.7
Fantasy points
Fantasy points per game (PPR)17.117.8
Fantasy points (PPR)102.489.1
Expected points per gameEst.18.618.2
Points vs expectedEst.−1.5+0.1

Week by week

Each bar is one game. Pick a stat to compare.

Target share by week

Out of all the passes his team threw in his games, the part thrown to him.

  • Malik Nabers
  • Tetairoa McMillan

— no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Target share by week
WeekMalik NabersTetairoa McMillan
131%against DAL24%against CHI
213%against LA31%against ATL
329%against TEN12%against CLE
424%against ARI41%against DET
538%against WAS— no game with a target, carry or dropback
635%against NO26%against PHI

Next to each number: that week's opponent. — no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Where they rank

Each player's place among players at his position who meet the leaderboard's minimum. Open a leaderboard for the full list.
Leaderboard ranks for Malik Nabers and Tetairoa McMillan
LeaderboardMalik NabersTetairoa McMillan
Target share leaders#6of 109 wide receivers#13of 109 wide receivers
Air-yards share leaders#22of 109 wide receivers#34of 109 wide receivers
Red-zone share leaders#7of 74 wide receivers#17of 74 wide receivers
Red-zone opportunity leaders#7of 187 wide receivers#17of 187 wide receivers
End-zone target leaders#5of 187 wide receivers#13of 187 wide receivers
Expected fantasy points leadersEst.#5of 187 wide receivers#7of 187 wide receivers

Talking points

Fact-checked notes from the weekly usage report, with the numbers behind them.

Malik Nabers

Touchdowns below usage

Malik Nabers has scored 2 touchdowns on opportunities that usually produce 4.0, per FFO's expected-points model.

Touchdowns
2
Expected touchdownsEst.
4.0
Expected PPR per gameEst.
18.6
PPR vs expected, per gameEst.
−1.5

Weeks 1–6 · 6 games

  • Model estimate, not a forecast: v1 predicts about as well as raw points.

Tetairoa McMillan

Touchdowns below usage

Tetairoa McMillan has scored 2 touchdowns on opportunities that usually produce 3.7, per FFO's expected-points model.

Touchdowns
2
Expected touchdownsEst.
3.7
Expected PPR per gameEst.
18.2
PPR vs expected, per gameEst.
+0.1

Weeks 1–4 and 6 · 5 games

  • Model estimate, not a forecast: v1 predicts about as well as raw points.

Keep exploring

Malik Nabers

More comparisons

Tetairoa McMillan

More comparisons

Compare two other players →