Usage comparison · Wide receivers

Michael Wilson vs Tetairoa McMillan

Tetairoa McMillan gets more of his team's passes (27% vs 26%), while Michael Wilson gets more of the deep throws (36% of his team's air yards vs 31%). In total, though, Michael Wilson has more targets (51 vs 39). Michael Wilson has played 5 games and Tetairoa McMillan 4 games. Near the end zone, Michael Wilson has had more chances (9 vs 6 plays within 20 yards), and the same share of their teams' chances there (15%). Tetairoa McMillan is scoring more fantasy points a game (18.6 vs 12.8, PPR), but the chances Michael Wilson gets usually score more: 19.1 vs 18.8 expected points a game Est..

2026 season · Weeks 1–5 · Updated Oct 12, 2026

WRARI

Michael Wilson
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
12.8
Expected points per gameEst.
19.1

5 games with a target, carry or dropback

WRCAR

Tetairoa McMillan
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
18.6
Expected points per gameEst.
18.8

4 games with a target, carry or dropback

Side by side

Season totals through week 4. Shares are of each player's team totals in the games he played. For counts and shares, the bigger number is in bold and the bars grow from the centre line.
Michael Wilson and Tetairoa McMillan, season usage side by side
StatMichael WilsonTetairoa McMillan
Games54
Passes thrown to him
Targets5139
Target share26%27%
Air-yards share36%31%
Catches2926
Receiving yards288385
Near the end zone
Red-zone chances96
Red-zone share15%15%
End-zone targets64
Touchdowns
Touchdowns12
Expected touchdownsEst.3.73.3
Fantasy points
Fantasy points per game (PPR)12.818.6
Fantasy points (PPR)64.174.5
Expected points per gameEst.19.118.8
Points vs expectedEst.−6.3+0.3

Week by week

Each bar is one game. Pick a stat to compare.

Target share by week

Out of all the passes his team threw in his games, the part thrown to him.

  • Michael Wilson
  • Tetairoa McMillan

— no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Target share by week
WeekMichael WilsonTetairoa McMillan
119%against LAC24%against CHI
227%against SEA31%against ATL
334%against SF12%against CLE
437%against NYG41%against DET
515%against DET— no game with a target, carry or dropback

Next to each number: that week's opponent. — no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Where they rank

Each player's place among players at his position who meet the leaderboard's minimum. Open a leaderboard for the full list.
Leaderboard ranks for Michael Wilson and Tetairoa McMillan
LeaderboardMichael WilsonTetairoa McMillan
Target share leaders#13of 103 wide receivers#12of 103 wide receivers
Air-yards share leaders#16of 103 wide receivers#34of 103 wide receivers
Red-zone share leaders#9of 59 wide receivers#10of 59 wide receivers
Red-zone opportunity leaders#4of 180 wide receivers#16of 180 wide receivers
End-zone target leaders#3of 180 wide receivers#19of 180 wide receivers
Expected fantasy points leadersEst.#3of 180 wide receivers#5of 180 wide receivers

Talking points

Fact-checked notes from the weekly usage report, with the numbers behind them.

Michael Wilson

Volume, not production

Michael Wilson has 36% of ARI's air yards but is scoring 6.3 PPR points a game below what that usage usually produces.

Air-yards share
36%
Targets
51
PPR vs expected, per gameEst.
−6.3

Weeks 1–5 · 5 games

Touchdowns below usage

Michael Wilson has scored 1 touchdown on opportunities that usually produce 3.7, per FFO's expected-points model.

Touchdowns
1
Expected touchdownsEst.
3.7
Expected PPR per gameEst.
19.1
PPR vs expected, per gameEst.
−6.3

Weeks 1–5 · 5 games

  • Model estimate, not a forecast: v1 predicts about as well as raw points.

Role down

Michael Wilson's target share fell to 15% in week 5 (7 targets), from 30% in weeks 1-4.

Target share, week 5
15%
Targets, week 5
7
Target share, weeks 1–4
30%
Targets, weeks 1–4
44

Weeks 1–5 · 5 games

  • Share of team targets/carries in games he played. Snap counts aren't in FFO's licensed data, so a low earlier share can mean limited playing time.

Tetairoa McMillan

Role up

Tetairoa McMillan's target share rose to 41% in week 4 (16 targets), from 21% in weeks 1-3.

Target share, week 4
41%
Targets, week 4
16
Target share, weeks 1–3
21%
Targets, weeks 1–3
23

Weeks 1–4 · 4 games

  • Share of team targets/carries in games he played. Snap counts aren't in FFO's licensed data, so a low earlier share can mean limited playing time.

Keep exploring