Usage comparison · Tight ends

Evan Engram vs Gavin Bartholomew

Evan Engram gets more of his team's passes (12% vs 11%) and more of the deep throws (11% of its air yards vs 7%). Evan Engram has played 5 games and Gavin Bartholomew 2 games. Near the end zone, Evan Engram has had more chances (2 vs 1 plays within 20 yards), and the same share of their teams' chances there (5%). Evan Engram is scoring more fantasy points a game (5.6 vs 4.9, PPR), but the chances Gavin Bartholomew gets usually score more: 6.0 vs 5.7 expected points a game Est..

2026 season · Weeks 1–5 · Updated Oct 12, 2026

TEDEN

Evan Engram
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
5.6
Expected points per gameEst.
5.7

5 games with a target, carry or dropback

TEMIN

Gavin Bartholomew
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
4.9
Expected points per gameEst.
6.0

2 games with a target, carry or dropback

Side by side

Season totals through week 4. Shares are of each player's team totals in the games he played. For counts and shares, the bigger number is in bold and the bars grow from the centre line.
Evan Engram and Gavin Bartholomew, season usage side by side
StatEvan EngramGavin Bartholomew
Games52
Passes thrown to him
Targets177
Target share12%11%
Air-yards share11%7%
Catches106
Receiving yards12137
Near the end zone
Red-zone chances21
Red-zone share5%5%
End-zone targets10
Touchdowns
Touchdowns10
Expected touchdownsEst.0.80.5
Fantasy points
Fantasy points per game (PPR)5.64.9
Fantasy points (PPR)28.19.7
Expected points per gameEst.5.76.0
Points vs expectedEst.0.0−1.1

Week by week

Each bar is one game. Pick a stat to compare.

Target share by week

Out of all the passes his team threw in his games, the part thrown to him.

  • Evan Engram
  • Gavin Bartholomew

— no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Target share by week
WeekEvan EngramGavin Bartholomew
119%against KC— no game with a target, carry or dropback
23%against JAX— no game with a target, carry or dropback
36%against LA— no game with a target, carry or dropback
413%against SF3%against MIA
518%against LAC21%against NO

Next to each number: that week's opponent. — no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Where they rank

Each player's place among players at his position who meet the leaderboard's minimum. Open a leaderboard for the full list.
Leaderboard ranks for Evan Engram and Gavin Bartholomew
LeaderboardEvan EngramGavin Bartholomew
Target share leaders#30of 38 tight endsBelow the minimum (at least 10 targets in at least 2 games)
Air-yards share leaders#22of 38 tight endsBelow the minimum (at least 10 targets in at least 2 games)
Red-zone share leadersBelow the minimum (at least 3 red-zone opportunities in at least 2 games)Below the minimum (at least 3 red-zone opportunities in at least 2 games)
Red-zone opportunity leaders#34of 101 tight ends#55of 101 tight ends
End-zone target leaders#32of 101 tight ends#71of 101 tight ends
Expected fantasy points leadersEst.#36of 101 tight ends#35of 101 tight ends

Talking points

Fact-checked notes from the weekly usage report, with the numbers behind them.

Evan Engram

No talking points for him in this week's report.

Gavin Bartholomew

Role up

Gavin Bartholomew's target share rose to 21% in week 5 (6 targets), from 3% in week 4.

Target share, week 5
21%
Targets, week 5
6
Target share, week 4
3%
Targets, week 4
1

Weeks 4–5 · 2 games

  • Share of team targets/carries in games he played. Snap counts aren't in FFO's licensed data, so a low earlier share can mean limited playing time.

Keep exploring