Fantasy FootballOutsiders

Usage comparison · Wide receivers

Drake London vs Wan'Dale Robinson

Drake London gets more of his team's passes (26% vs 21%) and more of the deep throws (37% of its air yards vs 16%). In total, though, Wan'Dale Robinson has more targets (23 vs 19). Drake London has played 3 games and Wan'Dale Robinson 4 games. Near the end zone, Wan'Dale Robinson has had more chances (4 vs 0 plays within 20 yards) and a bigger share of his team's chances there (10% vs 0%). Drake London is scoring more fantasy points a game (14.3 vs 10.1, PPR), and his chances usually score more too: 10.3 vs 10.1 expected points a game Est..

2026 season · Weeks 1–4 · Updated Oct 5, 2026

WRATL

Drake London
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
14.3
Expected points per gameEst.
10.3

3 games with a target, carry or dropback

WRTEN

Wan'Dale Robinson
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
10.1
Expected points per gameEst.
10.1

4 games with a target, carry or dropback

Side by side

Season totals through week 3. Shares are of each player's team totals in the games he played. For counts and shares, the bigger number is in bold and the bars grow from the centre line.
Drake London and Wan'Dale Robinson, season usage side by side
StatDrake LondonWan'Dale Robinson
Games34
Passes thrown to him
Targets1923
Target share26%21%
Air-yards share37%16%
Catches1516
Receiving yards274123
Near the end zone
Red-zone chances04
Red-zone share0%10%
End-zone targets02
Touchdowns
Touchdowns02
Expected touchdownsEst.0.21.4
Fantasy points
Fantasy points per game (PPR)14.310.1
Fantasy points (PPR)42.840.4
Expected points per gameEst.10.310.1
Points vs expectedEst.+4.00.0

Week by week

Each bar is one game. Pick a stat to compare.

Target share by week

Out of all the passes his team threw in his games, the part thrown to him.

  • Drake London
  • Wan'Dale Robinson

— no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Target share by week
WeekDrake LondonWan'Dale Robinson
121%against PIT21%against NYJ
216%against CAR6%against PHI
343%against GB31%against NYG
4— no game with a target, carry or dropback18%against BAL

Next to each number: that week's opponent. — no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Where they rank

Each player's place among players at his position who meet the leaderboard's minimum. Open a leaderboard for the full list.
Leaderboard ranks for Drake London and Wan'Dale Robinson
LeaderboardDrake LondonWan'Dale Robinson
Target share leaders#15of 96 wide receivers#31of 96 wide receivers
Air-yards share leaders#16of 96 wide receivers#72of 96 wide receivers
Red-zone share leadersBelow the minimum (at least 3 red-zone opportunities in at least 2 games)#34of 47 wide receivers
Red-zone opportunity leaders#133of 174 wide receivers#30of 174 wide receivers
End-zone target leaders#110of 174 wide receivers#46of 174 wide receivers
Expected fantasy points leadersEst.#41of 174 wide receivers#44of 174 wide receivers

Talking points

Fact-checked notes from the weekly usage report, with the numbers behind them.

Drake London

Role up

Drake London's target share rose to 43% in week 3 (10 targets), from 18% in weeks 1-2.

Target share, week 3
43%
Targets, week 3
10
Target share, weeks 1–2
18%
Targets, weeks 1–2
9

Weeks 1–3 · 3 games

  • Share of team targets/carries in games he played. Snap counts aren't in FFO's licensed data, so a low earlier share can mean limited playing time.

Wan'Dale Robinson

No talking points for him in this week's report.

Keep exploring

Drake London

More comparisons

Wan'Dale Robinson

More comparisons

Compare two other players →