Usage comparison · Wide receivers
Drake London gets more of his team's passes (26% vs 17%) and more of the deep throws (37% of its air yards vs 29%). In total, though, Tre Tucker has more targets (23 vs 19). Drake London has played 3 games and Tre Tucker 4 games. Near the end zone, Tre Tucker has had more chances (1 vs 0 plays within 20 yards) and a bigger share of his team's chances there (3% vs 0%). Drake London is scoring more fantasy points a game (14.3 vs 11.1, PPR), though their chances usually score the same: 10.3 expected points a game Est..
2026 season · Weeks 1–4 · Updated Oct 5, 2026
WRATL
Drake London3 games with a target, carry or dropback
WRLV
Tre Tucker4 games with a target, carry or dropback
| Stat | Drake London | Tre Tucker |
|---|---|---|
| Games | 3 | 4 |
| Passes thrown to him | ||
| Targets | 19 | 23 |
| Target share | 26% | 17% |
| Air-yards share | 37% | 29% |
| Catches | 15 | 15 |
| Receiving yards | 274 | 233 |
| Near the end zone | ||
| Red-zone chances | 0 | 1 |
| Red-zone share | 0% | 3% |
| End-zone targets | 0 | 2 |
| Touchdowns | ||
| Touchdowns | 0 | 1 |
| Expected touchdownsEst. | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Fantasy points | ||
| Fantasy points per game (PPR) | 14.3 | 11.1 |
| Fantasy points (PPR) | 42.8 | 44.3 |
| Expected points per gameEst. | 10.3 | 10.3 |
| Points vs expectedEst. | +4.0 | +0.8 |
Target share by week
Out of all the passes his team threw in his games, the part thrown to him.
— no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.
| Week | Drake London | Tre Tucker |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 21%against PIT | 14%against MIA |
| 2 | 16%against CAR | 24%against LAC |
| 3 | 43%against GB | 13%against NO |
| 4 | — no game with a target, carry or dropback | 17%against KC |
Next to each number: that week's opponent. — no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.
| Leaderboard | Drake London | Tre Tucker |
|---|---|---|
| Target share leaders | #15of 96 wide receivers | #53of 96 wide receivers |
| Air-yards share leaders | #16of 96 wide receivers | #34of 96 wide receivers |
| Red-zone share leaders | Below the minimum (at least 3 red-zone opportunities in at least 2 games) | Below the minimum (at least 3 red-zone opportunities in at least 2 games) |
| Red-zone opportunity leaders | #133of 174 wide receivers | #103of 174 wide receivers |
| End-zone target leaders | #110of 174 wide receivers | #43of 174 wide receivers |
| Expected fantasy points leadersEst. | #41of 174 wide receivers | #42of 174 wide receivers |
Role up
Weeks 1–3 · 3 games
No talking points for him in this week's report.
Drake London
More comparisons