Usage comparison · Wide receivers

Cooper Kupp vs Keon Coleman

Keon Coleman gets more of his team's passes (14% vs 13%) and more of the deep throws (19% of its air yards vs 15%). In total, though, Cooper Kupp has more targets (25 vs 18). Cooper Kupp has played 6 games and Keon Coleman 5 games. Near the end zone, Keon Coleman has had more chances (3 vs 2 plays within 20 yards) and a bigger share of his team's chances there (6% vs 4%). Keon Coleman is scoring more fantasy points a game (9.9 vs 6.7, PPR), but the chances Cooper Kupp gets usually score more: 7.1 vs 7.0 expected points a game Est..

2026 season · Weeks 1–6 · Updated Oct 16, 2026

WRSEA

Cooper Kupp
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
6.7
Expected points per gameEst.
7.1

6 games with a target, carry or dropback

WRBUF

Keon Coleman
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
9.9
Expected points per gameEst.
7.0

5 games with a target, carry or dropback

Side by side

Season totals through week 5. Shares are of each player's team totals in the games he played. For counts and shares, the bigger number is in bold and the bars grow from the centre line.
Cooper Kupp and Keon Coleman, season usage side by side
StatCooper KuppKeon Coleman
Games65
Passes thrown to him
Targets2518
Target share13%14%
Air-yards share15%19%
Catches1615
Receiving yards179224
Near the end zone
Red-zone chances23
Red-zone share4%6%
End-zone targets12
Touchdowns
Touchdowns12
Expected touchdownsEst.1.01.6
Fantasy points
Fantasy points per game (PPR)6.79.9
Fantasy points (PPR)39.949.4
Expected points per gameEst.7.17.0
Points vs expectedEst.−0.4+2.9

Week by week

Each bar is one game. Pick a stat to compare.

Target share by week

Out of all the passes his team threw in his games, the part thrown to him.

  • Cooper Kupp
  • Keon Coleman

— no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Target share by week
WeekCooper KuppKeon Coleman
113%against NE4%against HOU
28%against ARI21%against DET
311%against WAS8%against LAC
410%against LAC23%against NE
511%against SF11%against LA
622%against DEN— no game with a target, carry or dropback

Next to each number: that week's opponent. — no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Where they rank

Each player's place among players at his position who meet the leaderboard's minimum. Open a leaderboard for the full list.
Leaderboard ranks for Cooper Kupp and Keon Coleman
LeaderboardCooper KuppKeon Coleman
Target share leaders#72of 103 wide receivers#68of 103 wide receivers
Air-yards share leaders#79of 103 wide receivers#63of 103 wide receivers
Red-zone share leadersBelow the minimum (at least 3 red-zone opportunities in at least 2 games)#57of 61 wide receivers
Red-zone opportunity leaders#64of 181 wide receivers#55of 181 wide receivers
End-zone target leaders#68of 181 wide receivers#47of 181 wide receivers
Expected fantasy points leadersEst.#79of 181 wide receivers#80of 181 wide receivers

Talking points

Fact-checked notes from the weekly usage report, with the numbers behind them.

Cooper Kupp

Role up

Cooper Kupp's target share rose to 22% in week 6 (10 targets), from 11% in weeks 1-5.

Target share, week 6
22%
Targets, week 6
10
Target share, weeks 1–5
11%
Targets, weeks 1–5
15

Weeks 1–6 · 6 games

  • Share of team targets/carries in games he played. Snap counts aren't in FFO's licensed data, so a low earlier share can mean limited playing time.

Keon Coleman

No talking points for him in this week's report.

Keep exploring