Usage comparison · Wide receivers

CeeDee Lamb vs Puka Nacua

Puka Nacua gets more of his team's passes (33% vs 25%) and more of the deep throws (45% of its air yards vs 38%). In total, though, CeeDee Lamb has more targets (25 vs 9). CeeDee Lamb has played 3 games and Puka Nacua 1 game. Near the end zone, CeeDee Lamb has had more chances (3 vs 1 plays within 20 yards), but Puka Nacua gets a bigger share of his team's chances there (11% vs 9%). CeeDee Lamb is scoring more fantasy points a game (23.6 vs 12.4, PPR), but the chances Puka Nacua gets usually score more: 18.2 vs 16.2 expected points a game Est..

2026 season · Weeks 1–3 · Updated Sep 29, 2026

WRDAL

CeeDee Lamb

Fantasy points per game (PPR): 23.6
Expected points per gameEst.: 16.2

3 games with a target, carry or dropback

WRLA

Puka Nacua

Fantasy points per game (PPR): 12.4
Expected points per gameEst.: 18.2

1 game with a target, carry or dropback

Week 3 injury report: Doubtful (Hip)

Side by side

Season totals through week 3. Shares are of each player's team totals in the games he played. For counts and shares, the bigger number is in bold and the bars grow from the centre line.

CeeDee Lamb and Puka Nacua, season usage side by side
Stat	CeeDee Lamb	Puka Nacua
Games	3	1
Passes thrown to him
Targets	25	9
Target share	25%	33%
Air-yards share	38%	45%
Catches	20	5
Receiving yards	309	74
Near the end zone
Red-zone chances	3	1
Red-zone share	9%	11%
End-zone targets	3	0
Touchdowns
Touchdowns	3	0
Expected touchdownsEst.	2.1	0.8
Fantasy points
Fantasy points per game (PPR)	23.6	12.4
Fantasy points (PPR)	70.9	12.4
Expected points per gameEst.	16.2	18.2
Points vs expectedEst.	+6.8	−5.8

Week by week

Each bar is one game. Pick a stat to compare.

Target share by week

Out of all the passes his team threw in his games, the part thrown to him.

CeeDee Lamb
Puka Nacua

— no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Target share by week
Week	CeeDee Lamb	Puka Nacua
1	27%against NYG	33%against SF
2	29%against WAS	— no game with a target, carry or dropback
3	20%against BAL	— no game with a target, carry or dropback

Next to each number: that week's opponent. — no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Where they rank

Each player's place among players at his position who meet the leaderboard's minimum. Open a leaderboard for the full list.

Leaderboard ranks for CeeDee Lamb and Puka Nacua
Leaderboard	CeeDee Lamb	Puka Nacua
Target share leaders	#18of 74 wide receivers	Below the minimum (at least 10 targets in at least 2 games)
Air-yards share leaders	#16of 74 wide receivers	Below the minimum (at least 10 targets in at least 2 games)
Red-zone share leaders	#32of 35 wide receivers	Below the minimum (at least 3 red-zone opportunities in at least 2 games)
Red-zone opportunity leaders	#22of 166 wide receivers	#87of 166 wide receivers
End-zone target leaders	#4of 166 wide receivers	#150of 166 wide receivers
Expected fantasy points leadersEst.	#10of 166 wide receivers	#7of 166 wide receivers

Talking points

Fact-checked notes from the weekly usage report, with the numbers behind them.

CeeDee Lamb

No talking points for him in this week's report.

Puka Nacua

Injury opening

Puka Nacua is listed doubtful (hip) on the week 3 report. He has 33% of LA's targets. Other WRs by share: Davante Adams (27%), Konata Mumpfield (10%).

Week 3 official injury report: Doubtful (hip)
Target share: 33%
Next by share: Davante Adams 27%, Konata Mumpfield 10%

Week 1 · 1 game

Keep exploring

CeeDee Lamb

More comparisons

Puka Nacua

More comparisons

Compare two other players →