Usage comparison · Wide receivers
Malik Nabers gets more of his team's passes (30% vs 29%), while CeeDee Lamb gets more of the deep throws (37% of his team's air yards vs 35%). In total, though, CeeDee Lamb has more targets (69 vs 61). Near the end zone, CeeDee Lamb has had more chances (10 vs 8 plays within 20 yards), but Malik Nabers gets a bigger share of his team's chances there (16% vs 15%). CeeDee Lamb is scoring more fantasy points a game (21.8 vs 17.1, PPR), and his chances usually score more too: 20.8 vs 18.6 expected points a game Est..
2026 season · Weeks 1–6 · Updated Oct 19, 2026
WRDAL
CeeDee Lamb6 games with a target, carry or dropback
WRNYG
Malik Nabers6 games with a target, carry or dropback
| Stat | CeeDee Lamb | Malik Nabers |
|---|---|---|
| Games | 6 | 6 |
| Passes thrown to him | ||
| Targets | 69 | 61 |
| Target share | 29% | 30% |
| Air-yards share | 37% | 35% |
| Catches | 48 | 41 |
| Receiving yards | 577 | 494 |
| Near the end zone | ||
| Red-zone chances | 10 | 8 |
| Red-zone share | 15% | 16% |
| End-zone targets | 8 | 7 |
| Touchdowns | ||
| Touchdowns | 4 | 2 |
| Expected touchdownsEst. | 4.3 | 4.0 |
| Fantasy points | ||
| Fantasy points per game (PPR) | 21.8 | 17.1 |
| Fantasy points (PPR) | 131.1 | 102.4 |
| Expected points per gameEst. | 20.8 | 18.6 |
| Points vs expectedEst. | +0.8 | −1.5 |
Target share by week
Out of all the passes his team threw in his games, the part thrown to him.
| Week | CeeDee Lamb | Malik Nabers |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 27%against NYG | 31%against DAL |
| 2 | 29%against WAS | 13%against LA |
| 3 | 20%against BAL | 29%against TEN |
| 4 | 49%against HOU | 24%against ARI |
| 5 | 12%against TB | 38%against WAS |
| 6 | 33%against GB | 35%against NO |
Next to each number: that week's opponent.
| Leaderboard | CeeDee Lamb | Malik Nabers |
|---|---|---|
| Target share leaders | #7of 109 wide receivers | #6of 109 wide receivers |
| Air-yards share leaders | #15of 109 wide receivers | #22of 109 wide receivers |
| Red-zone share leaders | #11of 74 wide receivers | #7of 74 wide receivers |
| Red-zone opportunity leaders | #5of 187 wide receivers | #7of 187 wide receivers |
| End-zone target leaders | #2of 187 wide receivers | #5of 187 wide receivers |
| Expected fantasy points leadersEst. | #3of 187 wide receivers | #5of 187 wide receivers |
No talking points for him in this week's report.
Touchdowns below usage
Weeks 1–6 · 6 games
CeeDee Lamb
More comparisons