Fantasy FootballOutsiders

Usage comparison · Wide receivers

Carnell Tate vs Luther Burden III

Carnell Tate gets more of his team's passes (30% vs 24%) and more of the deep throws (48% of its air yards vs 26%). Near the end zone, Luther Burden III has had more chances (7 vs 1 plays within 20 yards) and a bigger share of his team's chances there (10% vs 3%). They are scoring the same fantasy points a game (11.7, PPR), but the chances Carnell Tate gets usually score more: 13.5 vs 13.1 expected points a game Est..

2026 season · Weeks 1–4 · Updated Oct 6, 2026

WRTENRookie

Carnell Tate
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
11.7
Expected points per gameEst.
13.5

4 games with a target, carry or dropback

WRCHI

Luther Burden III
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
11.7
Expected points per gameEst.
13.1

4 games with a target, carry or dropback

Side by side

Season totals through week 4. Shares are of each player's team totals in the games he played. For counts and shares, the bigger number is in bold and the bars grow from the centre line.
Carnell Tate and Luther Burden III, season usage side by side
StatCarnell TateLuther Burden III
Games44
Passes thrown to him
Targets3229
Target share30%24%
Air-yards share48%26%
Catches2219
Receiving yards268219
Near the end zone
Red-zone chances17
Red-zone share3%10%
End-zone targets13
Touchdowns
Touchdowns01
Expected touchdownsEst.0.91.5
Fantasy points
Fantasy points per game (PPR)11.711.7
Fantasy points (PPR)46.846.9
Expected points per gameEst.13.513.1
Points vs expectedEst.−1.3−0.9

Week by week

Each bar is one game. Pick a stat to compare.

Target share by week

Out of all the passes his team threw in his games, the part thrown to him.

  • Carnell Tate
  • Luther Burden III
Target share by week
WeekCarnell TateLuther Burden III
121%against NYJ19%against CAR
229%against PHI23%against MIN
326%against NYG32%against PHI
443%against BAL19%against NYJ

Next to each number: that week's opponent.

Where they rank

Each player's place among players at his position who meet the leaderboard's minimum. Open a leaderboard for the full list.
Leaderboard ranks for Carnell Tate and Luther Burden III
LeaderboardCarnell TateLuther Burden III
Target share leaders#6of 97 wide receivers#23of 97 wide receivers
Air-yards share leaders#4of 97 wide receivers#43of 97 wide receivers
Red-zone share leadersBelow the minimum (at least 3 red-zone opportunities in at least 2 games)#34of 47 wide receivers
Red-zone opportunity leaders#83of 174 wide receivers#5of 174 wide receivers
End-zone target leaders#53of 174 wide receivers#21of 174 wide receivers
Expected fantasy points leadersEst.#19of 174 wide receivers#22of 174 wide receivers

Talking points

Fact-checked notes from the weekly usage report, with the numbers behind them.

Carnell Tate

Role up

Carnell Tate's target share rose to 43% in week 4 (12 targets), from 25% in weeks 1-3.

Target share, week 4
43%
Targets, week 4
12
Target share, weeks 1–3
25%
Targets, weeks 1–3
20

Weeks 1–4 · 4 games

  • Share of team targets/carries in games he played. Snap counts aren't in FFO's licensed data, so a low earlier share can mean limited playing time.

Rookie role

Rookie Carnell Tate has a 30% target share through 4 games.

Target share
30%
Targets
32

Weeks 1–4 · 4 games

Luther Burden III

No talking points for him in this week's report.

Keep exploring

Carnell Tate

More comparisons

Luther Burden III

More comparisons

Compare two other players →