Usage comparison · Wide receivers

Carnell Tate vs Devaughn Vele

Carnell Tate gets more of his team's passes (30% vs 18%) and more of the deep throws (48% of its air yards vs 22%). Carnell Tate has played 4 games and Devaughn Vele 3 games. Near the end zone, Devaughn Vele has had more chances (3 vs 1 plays within 20 yards) and a bigger share of his team's chances there (9% vs 3%). Devaughn Vele is scoring more fantasy points a game (12.7 vs 11.7, PPR), but the chances Carnell Tate gets usually score more: 13.5 vs 13.2 expected points a game Est..

2026 season · Weeks 1–4 · Updated Oct 5, 2026

WRTENRookie

Carnell Tate
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
11.7
Expected points per gameEst.
13.5

4 games with a target, carry or dropback

WRNO

Devaughn Vele
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
12.7
Expected points per gameEst.
13.2

3 games with a target, carry or dropback

Side by side

Season totals through week 3. Shares are of each player's team totals in the games he played. For counts and shares, the bigger number is in bold and the bars grow from the centre line.
Carnell Tate and Devaughn Vele, season usage side by side
StatCarnell TateDevaughn Vele
Games43
Passes thrown to him
Targets3222
Target share30%18%
Air-yards share48%22%
Catches2215
Receiving yards268172
Near the end zone
Red-zone chances13
Red-zone share3%9%
End-zone targets13
Touchdowns
Touchdowns01
Expected touchdownsEst.0.91.4
Fantasy points
Fantasy points per game (PPR)11.712.7
Fantasy points (PPR)46.838.2
Expected points per gameEst.13.513.2
Points vs expectedEst.−1.3−0.5

Week by week

Each bar is one game. Pick a stat to compare.

Target share by week

Out of all the passes his team threw in his games, the part thrown to him.

  • Carnell Tate
  • Devaughn Vele

— no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Target share by week
WeekCarnell TateDevaughn Vele
121%against NYJ17%against DET
229%against PHI22%against BAL
326%against NYG15%against LV
443%against BAL— no game with a target, carry or dropback

Next to each number: that week's opponent. — no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Where they rank

Each player's place among players at his position who meet the leaderboard's minimum. Open a leaderboard for the full list.
Leaderboard ranks for Carnell Tate and Devaughn Vele
LeaderboardCarnell TateDevaughn Vele
Target share leaders#6of 96 wide receivers#48of 96 wide receivers
Air-yards share leaders#4of 96 wide receivers#55of 96 wide receivers
Red-zone share leadersBelow the minimum (at least 3 red-zone opportunities in at least 2 games)#39of 47 wide receivers
Red-zone opportunity leaders#81of 174 wide receivers#34of 174 wide receivers
End-zone target leaders#53of 174 wide receivers#14of 174 wide receivers
Expected fantasy points leadersEst.#18of 174 wide receivers#20of 174 wide receivers

Talking points

Fact-checked notes from the weekly usage report, with the numbers behind them.

Carnell Tate

Role up

Carnell Tate's target share rose to 43% in week 4 (12 targets), from 25% in weeks 1-3.

Target share, week 4
43%
Targets, week 4
12
Target share, weeks 1–3
25%
Targets, weeks 1–3
20

Weeks 1–4 · 4 games

  • Share of team targets/carries in games he played. Snap counts aren't in FFO's licensed data, so a low earlier share can mean limited playing time.

Rookie role

Rookie Carnell Tate has a 30% target share through 4 games.

Target share
30%
Targets
32

Weeks 1–4 · 4 games

Devaughn Vele

No talking points for him in this week's report.

Keep exploring