Usage comparison · Tight ends

Cade Otton vs Terrance Ferguson

Cade Otton gets more of his team's passes (15% vs 11%) and more of the deep throws (13% of its air yards vs 7%). Cade Otton has played 7 games and Terrance Ferguson 3 games. Near the end zone, Cade Otton has had more chances (3 vs 1 plays within 20 yards), and the same share of their teams' chances there (4%). Terrance Ferguson is scoring more fantasy points a game (6.4 vs 5.4, PPR), though their chances usually score the same: 6.7 expected points a game Est..

2026 season · Weeks 1–7 · Updated Oct 27, 2026

TETB

Cade Otton
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
5.4
Expected points per gameEst.
6.7

7 games with a target, carry or dropback

TELA

Terrance Ferguson
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
6.4
Expected points per gameEst.
6.7

3 games with a target, carry or dropback

Side by side

Season totals through week 7. Shares are of each player's team totals in the games he played. For counts and shares, the bigger number is in bold and the bars grow from the centre line.
Cade Otton and Terrance Ferguson, season usage side by side
StatCade OttonTerrance Ferguson
Games73
Passes thrown to him
Targets3012
Target share15%11%
Air-yards share13%7%
Catches197
Receiving yards18663
Near the end zone
Red-zone chances31
Red-zone share4%4%
End-zone targets11
Touchdowns
Touchdowns01
Expected touchdownsEst.0.60.5
Fantasy points
Fantasy points per game (PPR)5.46.4
Fantasy points (PPR)37.619.3
Expected points per gameEst.6.76.7
Points vs expectedEst.−1.4−0.3

Week by week

Each bar is one game. Pick a stat to compare.

Target share by week

Out of all the passes his team threw in his games, the part thrown to him.

  • Cade Otton
  • Terrance Ferguson

— no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Target share by week
WeekCade OttonTerrance Ferguson
119%against CIN4%against SF
218%against CLE30%against NYG
317%against MIN4%against DEN
423%against GB— no game with a target, carry or dropback
516%against DAL— no game with a target, carry or dropback
65%against PIT— no game with a target, carry or dropback
79%against CAR— no game with a target, carry or dropback

Next to each number: that week's opponent. — no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Where they rank

Each player's place among players at his position who meet the leaderboard's minimum. Open a leaderboard for the full list.
Leaderboard ranks for Cade Otton and Terrance Ferguson
LeaderboardCade OttonTerrance Ferguson
Target share leaders#21of 52 tight ends#31of 52 tight ends
Air-yards share leaders#18of 52 tight ends#35of 52 tight ends
Red-zone share leaders#39of 39 tight endsBelow the minimum (at least 3 red-zone opportunities in at least 2 games)
Red-zone opportunity leaders#30of 109 tight ends#78of 109 tight ends
End-zone target leaders#36of 109 tight ends#54of 109 tight ends
Expected fantasy points leadersEst.#29of 109 tight ends#30of 109 tight ends

Keep exploring