Volume, not production
Adonai Mitchell has 45% of NYJ's air yards but is scoring 3.2 PPR points a game below what that usage usually produces.
- Air-yards share
- 45%
- Targets
- 18
- PPR vs expected, per gameEst.
- −3.2
Weeks 1–2 and 7 · 3 games
Usage comparison · Wide receivers
Adonai Mitchell vs Rome Odunze
Adonai Mitchell gets more of his team's passes (20% vs 17%) and more of the deep throws (45% of its air yards vs 30%). In total, though, Rome Odunze has more targets (38 vs 18). Adonai Mitchell has played 3 games and Rome Odunze 7 games. Near the end zone, Rome Odunze has had more chances (5 vs 2 plays within 20 yards), but Adonai Mitchell gets a bigger share of his team's chances there (8% vs 5%). Rome Odunze is scoring more fantasy points a game (8.6 vs 7.1, PPR), but the chances Adonai Mitchell gets usually score more: 10.3 vs 10.1 expected points a game Est..
2026 season · Weeks 1–7 · Updated Oct 27, 2026
WRNYJ
Adonai Mitchell- Fantasy points per game (PPR)
- 7.1
- Expected points per gameEst.
- 10.3
3 games with a target, carry or dropback
WRCHI
Rome Odunze- Fantasy points per game (PPR)
- 8.6
- Expected points per gameEst.
- 10.1
7 games with a target, carry or dropback
Side by side
Season totals through week 7. Shares are of each player's team totals in the games he played. For counts and shares, the bigger number is in bold and the bars grow from the centre line.
| Stat | Adonai Mitchell | Rome Odunze |
|---|---|---|
| Games | 3 | 7 |
| Passes thrown to him | ||
| Targets | 18 | 38 |
| Target share | 20% | 17% |
| Air-yards share | 45% | 30% |
| Catches | 9 | 24 |
| Receiving yards | 123 | 381 |
| Near the end zone | ||
| Red-zone chances | 2 | 5 |
| Red-zone share | 8% | 5% |
| End-zone targets | 1 | 4 |
| Touchdowns | ||
| Touchdowns | 0 | 0 |
| Expected touchdownsEst. | 0.8 | 2.3 |
| Fantasy points | ||
| Fantasy points per game (PPR) | 7.1 | 8.6 |
| Fantasy points (PPR) | 21.3 | 60.1 |
| Expected points per gameEst. | 10.3 | 10.1 |
| Points vs expectedEst. | −3.2 | −1.2 |
Week by week
Each bar is one game. Pick a stat to compare.
Target share by week
Out of all the passes his team threw in his games, the part thrown to him.
- Adonai Mitchell
- Rome Odunze
— no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.
| Week | Adonai Mitchell | Rome Odunze |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 13%against TEN | 12%against CAR |
| 2 | 33%against GB | 13%against MIN |
| 3 | — no game with a target, carry or dropback | 18%against PHI |
| 4 | — no game with a target, carry or dropback | 23%against NYJ |
| 5 | — no game with a target, carry or dropback | 23%against GB |
| 6 | — no game with a target, carry or dropback | 12%against ATL |
| 7 | 10%against MIA | 17%against NE |
Next to each number: that week's opponent. — no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.
Where they rank
Each player's place among players at his position who meet the leaderboard's minimum. Open a leaderboard for the full list.
| Leaderboard | Adonai Mitchell | Rome Odunze |
|---|---|---|
| Target share leaders | #34of 117 wide receivers | #53of 117 wide receivers |
| Air-yards share leaders | #5of 117 wide receivers | #31of 117 wide receivers |
| Red-zone share leaders | Below the minimum (at least 3 red-zone opportunities in at least 2 games) | #81of 85 wide receivers |
| Red-zone opportunity leaders | #86of 191 wide receivers | #42of 191 wide receivers |
| End-zone target leaders | #73of 191 wide receivers | #30of 191 wide receivers |
| Expected fantasy points leadersEst. | #41of 191 wide receivers | #43of 191 wide receivers |
Talking points
Fact-checked notes from the weekly usage report, with the numbers behind them.
Adonai Mitchell
Rome Odunze
Touchdowns below usage
Rome Odunze has scored 0 touchdowns on opportunities that usually produce 2.2, per FFO's expected-points model.
- Touchdowns
- 0
- Expected touchdownsEst.
- 2.2
- Expected PPR per gameEst.
- 10.1
- PPR vs expected, per gameEst.
- −1.2
Weeks 1–7 · 7 games
- Model estimate, not a forecast: v1 predicts about as well as raw points.
Keep exploring
Adonai Mitchell
More comparisons
Rome Odunze
More comparisons