Usage comparison · Tight ends

Mike Gesicki vs Pat Freiermuth

Pat Freiermuth gets more of his team's passes (13% vs 11%), while Mike Gesicki gets more of the deep throws (15% of his team's air yards vs 14%). Mike Gesicki has played 4 games and Pat Freiermuth 6 games. Near the end zone, Pat Freiermuth has had more chances (5 vs 4 plays within 20 yards) and a bigger share of his team's chances there (13% vs 8%). Mike Gesicki is scoring more fantasy points a game (13.0 vs 10.6, PPR), and his chances usually score more too: 9.2 vs 9.0 expected points a game Est..

2026 season · Weeks 1–7 · Updated Oct 23, 2026

TECIN

Mike Gesicki
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
13.0
Expected points per gameEst.
9.2

4 games with a target, carry or dropback

TEPIT

Pat Freiermuth
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
10.6
Expected points per gameEst.
9.0

6 games with a target, carry or dropback

Side by side

Season totals through week 6. Shares are of each player's team totals in the games he played. For counts and shares, the bigger number is in bold and the bars grow from the centre line.
Mike Gesicki and Pat Freiermuth, season usage side by side
StatMike GesickiPat Freiermuth
Games46
Passes thrown to him
Targets1729
Target share11%13%
Air-yards share15%14%
Catches1221
Receiving yards159180
Near the end zone
Red-zone chances45
Red-zone share8%13%
End-zone targets33
Touchdowns
Touchdowns44
Expected touchdownsEst.2.22.0
Fantasy points
Fantasy points per game (PPR)13.010.6
Fantasy points (PPR)51.963.4
Expected points per gameEst.9.29.0
Points vs expectedEst.+3.8+1.5

Week by week

Each bar is one game. Pick a stat to compare.

Target share by week

Out of all the passes his team threw in his games, the part thrown to him.

  • Mike Gesicki
  • Pat Freiermuth

— no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Target share by week
WeekMike GesickiPat Freiermuth
121%against TB14%against ATL
2— no game with a target, carry or dropback14%against NE
38%against PIT13%against CIN
49%against JAX13%against CLE
56%against MIA23%against IND
6— no game with a target, carry or dropback7%against TB
7— no game with a target, carry or dropback— no game with a target, carry or dropback

Next to each number: that week's opponent. — no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Where they rank

Each player's place among players at his position who meet the leaderboard's minimum. Open a leaderboard for the full list.
Leaderboard ranks for Mike Gesicki and Pat Freiermuth
LeaderboardMike GesickiPat Freiermuth
Target share leaders#34of 47 tight ends#28of 47 tight ends
Air-yards share leaders#12of 47 tight ends#14of 47 tight ends
Red-zone share leaders#23of 35 tight ends#7of 35 tight ends
Red-zone opportunity leaders#25of 104 tight ends#19of 104 tight ends
End-zone target leaders#15of 104 tight ends#16of 104 tight ends
Expected fantasy points leadersEst.#15of 104 tight ends#16of 104 tight ends

Talking points

Fact-checked notes from the weekly usage report, with the numbers behind them.

Mike Gesicki

Touchdowns above usage

Mike Gesicki has scored 4 touchdowns on opportunities that usually produce 2.2, per FFO's expected-points model.

Touchdowns
4
Expected touchdownsEst.
2.2
Expected PPR per gameEst.
9.2
PPR vs expected, per gameEst.
+3.8

Weeks 1 and 3–5 · 4 games

  • Model estimate, not a forecast: v1 predicts about as well as raw points.

Pat Freiermuth

Touchdowns above usage

Pat Freiermuth has scored 4 touchdowns on opportunities that usually produce 2.0, per FFO's expected-points model.

Touchdowns
4
Expected touchdownsEst.
2.0
Expected PPR per gameEst.
9.0
PPR vs expected, per gameEst.
+1.5

Weeks 1–6 · 6 games

  • Model estimate, not a forecast: v1 predicts about as well as raw points.

Keep exploring