Usage comparison · Tight ends
Mark Redman vs Tanner Hudson
Mark Redman gets more of his team's passes (7% vs 5%) and more of the deep throws (10% of its air yards vs 2%). In total, though, Tanner Hudson has more targets (7 vs 2). Mark Redman has played 1 game and Tanner Hudson 4 games. Near the end zone, Tanner Hudson has had more chances (3 vs 0 plays within 20 yards) and a bigger share of his team's chances there (6% vs 0%). Mark Redman is scoring more fantasy points a game (4.9 vs 4.1, PPR), but the chances Tanner Hudson gets usually score more: 3.4 vs 3.3 expected points a game Est..
2026 season · Weeks 1–5 · Updated Oct 12, 2026
TEGB
Mark Redman- Fantasy points per game (PPR)
- 4.9
- Expected points per gameEst.
- 3.3
1 game with a target, carry or dropback
TECIN
Tanner Hudson- Fantasy points per game (PPR)
- 4.1
- Expected points per gameEst.
- 3.4
4 games with a target, carry or dropback
Side by side
| Stat | Mark Redman | Tanner Hudson |
|---|---|---|
| Games | 1 | 4 |
| Passes thrown to him | ||
| Targets | 2 | 7 |
| Target share | 7% | 5% |
| Air-yards share | 10% | 2% |
| Catches | 2 | 7 |
| Receiving yards | 29 | 33 |
| Near the end zone | ||
| Red-zone chances | 0 | 3 |
| Red-zone share | 0% | 6% |
| End-zone targets | 0 | 1 |
| Touchdowns | ||
| Touchdowns | 0 | 1 |
| Expected touchdownsEst. | 0.0 | 0.8 |
| Fantasy points | ||
| Fantasy points per game (PPR) | 4.9 | 4.1 |
| Fantasy points (PPR) | 4.9 | 16.3 |
| Expected points per gameEst. | 3.3 | 3.4 |
| Points vs expectedEst. | +1.6 | +0.7 |
Week by week
Target share by week
Out of all the passes his team threw in his games, the part thrown to him.
- Mark Redman
- Tanner Hudson
— no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.
| Week | Mark Redman | Tanner Hudson |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | — no game with a target, carry or dropback | 3%against TB |
| 2 | — no game with a target, carry or dropback | — no game with a target, carry or dropback |
| 3 | — no game with a target, carry or dropback | 5%against PIT |
| 4 | 7%against TB | 2%against JAX |
| 5 | — no game with a target, carry or dropback | 10%against MIA |
Next to each number: that week's opponent. — no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.
Where they rank
| Leaderboard | Mark Redman | Tanner Hudson |
|---|---|---|
| Target share leaders | Below the minimum (at least 10 targets in at least 2 games) | Below the minimum (at least 10 targets in at least 2 games) |
| Air-yards share leaders | Below the minimum (at least 10 targets in at least 2 games) | Below the minimum (at least 10 targets in at least 2 games) |
| Red-zone share leaders | Below the minimum (at least 3 red-zone opportunities in at least 2 games) | #28of 28 tight ends |
| Red-zone opportunity leaders | #93of 101 tight ends | #28of 101 tight ends |
| End-zone target leaders | #86of 101 tight ends | #44of 101 tight ends |
| Expected fantasy points leadersEst. | #57of 101 tight ends | #56of 101 tight ends |
Keep exploring
Mark Redman
More comparisons
Tanner Hudson
More comparisons