Usage comparison · Wide receivers

Jameson Williams vs Luther Burden III

Luther Burden III gets more of his team's passes (21% vs 17%), while Jameson Williams gets more of the deep throws (32% of his team's air yards vs 24%). Jameson Williams has played 6 games and Luther Burden III 7 games. Near the end zone, Luther Burden III has had more chances (12 vs 7 plays within 20 yards) and a bigger share of his team's chances there (12% vs 8%). Jameson Williams is scoring more fantasy points a game (14.0 vs 13.9, PPR), but the chances Luther Burden III gets usually score more: 12.3 vs 12.2 expected points a game Est..

2026 season · Weeks 1–7 · Updated Oct 27, 2026

WRDET

Jameson Williams
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
14.0
Expected points per gameEst.
12.2

6 games with a target, carry or dropback

WRCHI

Luther Burden III
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
13.9
Expected points per gameEst.
12.3

7 games with a target, carry or dropback

Side by side

Season totals through week 7. Shares are of each player's team totals in the games he played. For counts and shares, the bigger number is in bold and the bars grow from the centre line.
Jameson Williams and Luther Burden III, season usage side by side
StatJameson WilliamsLuther Burden III
Games67
Passes thrown to him
Targets3847
Target share17%21%
Air-yards share32%24%
Catches2335
Receiving yards367491
Near the end zone
Red-zone chances712
Red-zone share8%12%
End-zone targets43
Touchdowns
Touchdowns42
Expected touchdownsEst.3.12.3
Fantasy points
Fantasy points per game (PPR)14.013.9
Fantasy points (PPR)83.797.0
Expected points per gameEst.12.212.3
Points vs expectedEst.+1.7+1.8

Week by week

Each bar is one game. Pick a stat to compare.

Target share by week

Out of all the passes his team threw in his games, the part thrown to him.

  • Jameson Williams
  • Luther Burden III

— no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Target share by week
WeekJameson WilliamsLuther Burden III
123%against NO19%against CAR
211%against BUF23%against MIN
313%against NYJ32%against PHI
416%against CAR19%against NYJ
514%against ARI15%against GB
6— no game with a target, carry or dropback24%against ATL
729%against GB13%against NE

Next to each number: that week's opponent. — no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Where they rank

Each player's place among players at his position who meet the leaderboard's minimum. Open a leaderboard for the full list.
Leaderboard ranks for Jameson Williams and Luther Burden III
LeaderboardJameson WilliamsLuther Burden III
Target share leaders#49of 117 wide receivers#33of 117 wide receivers
Air-yards share leaders#27of 117 wide receivers#51of 117 wide receivers
Red-zone share leaders#53of 85 wide receivers#28of 85 wide receivers
Red-zone opportunity leaders#21of 191 wide receivers#6of 191 wide receivers
End-zone target leaders#26of 191 wide receivers#41of 191 wide receivers
Expected fantasy points leadersEst.#30of 191 wide receivers#28of 191 wide receivers

Talking points

Fact-checked notes from the weekly usage report, with the numbers behind them.

Jameson Williams

Role up

Jameson Williams's target share rose to 29% in week 7 (9 targets), from 15% in weeks 1-5.

Target share, week 7
29%
Targets, week 7
9
Target share, weeks 1–5
15%
Targets, weeks 1–5
29

Weeks 1–5 and 7 · 6 games

  • Share of team targets/carries in games he played. Snap counts aren't in FFO's licensed data, so a low earlier share can mean limited playing time.

Luther Burden III

No talking points for him in this week's report.

Keep exploring