Usage comparison · Wide receivers

Drake London vs Stefon Diggs

Drake London gets more of his team's passes (29% vs 24%) and more of the deep throws (44% of its air yards vs 21%). Drake London has played 6 games and Stefon Diggs 4 games. Near the end zone, Stefon Diggs has had more chances (4 vs 2 plays within 20 yards) and a bigger share of his team's chances there (12% vs 4%). Drake London is scoring more fantasy points a game (14.7 vs 13.3, PPR), but the chances Stefon Diggs gets usually score more: 13.5 vs 13.3 expected points a game Est..

2026 season · Weeks 1–6 · Updated Oct 19, 2026

WRATL

Drake London
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
14.7
Expected points per gameEst.
13.3

6 games with a target, carry or dropback

WRWAS

Stefon Diggs
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
13.3
Expected points per gameEst.
13.5

4 games with a target, carry or dropback

Week 6 injury report: Questionable (Hamstring)

Side by side

Season totals through week 5. Shares are of each player's team totals in the games he played. For counts and shares, the bigger number is in bold and the bars grow from the centre line.
Drake London and Stefon Diggs, season usage side by side
StatDrake LondonStefon Diggs
Games64
Passes thrown to him
Targets4631
Target share29%24%
Air-yards share44%21%
Catches3118
Receiving yards550170
Near the end zone
Red-zone chances24
Red-zone share4%12%
End-zone targets22
Touchdowns
Touchdowns03
Expected touchdownsEst.1.51.7
Fantasy points
Fantasy points per game (PPR)14.713.3
Fantasy points (PPR)88.453.0
Expected points per gameEst.13.313.5
Points vs expectedEst.+1.1−0.3

Week by week

Each bar is one game. Pick a stat to compare.

Target share by week

Out of all the passes his team threw in his games, the part thrown to him.

  • Drake London
  • Stefon Diggs

— no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Target share by week
WeekDrake LondonStefon Diggs
121%against PIT31%against PHI
216%against CAR18%against DAL
343%against GB23%against SEA
430%against NO25%against IND
532%against BAL— no game with a target, carry or dropback
630%against CHI— no game with a target, carry or dropback

Next to each number: that week's opponent. — no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Where they rank

Each player's place among players at his position who meet the leaderboard's minimum. Open a leaderboard for the full list.
Leaderboard ranks for Drake London and Stefon Diggs
LeaderboardDrake LondonStefon Diggs
Target share leaders#8of 109 wide receivers#22of 109 wide receivers
Air-yards share leaders#6of 109 wide receivers#58of 109 wide receivers
Red-zone share leadersBelow the minimum (at least 3 red-zone opportunities in at least 2 games)#21of 74 wide receivers
Red-zone opportunity leaders#81of 187 wide receivers#52of 187 wide receivers
End-zone target leaders#46of 187 wide receivers#63of 187 wide receivers
Expected fantasy points leadersEst.#26of 187 wide receivers#24of 187 wide receivers

Talking points

Fact-checked notes from the weekly usage report, with the numbers behind them.

Drake London

Touchdowns below usage

Drake London has scored 0 touchdowns on opportunities that usually produce 1.5, per FFO's expected-points model.

Touchdowns
0
Expected touchdownsEst.
1.5
Expected PPR per gameEst.
13.3
PPR vs expected, per gameEst.
+1.1

Weeks 1–6 · 6 games

  • Model estimate, not a forecast: v1 predicts about as well as raw points.

Stefon Diggs

No talking points for him in this week's report.

Keep exploring