Usage comparison · Wide receivers

Drake London vs Mike Evans

Drake London gets more of his team's passes (29% vs 25%) and more of the deep throws (44% of its air yards vs 43%). Drake London has played 6 games and Mike Evans 5 games. Near the end zone, Mike Evans has had more chances (6 vs 2 plays within 20 yards) and a bigger share of his team's chances there (12% vs 4%). Mike Evans is scoring more fantasy points a game (15.3 vs 14.7, PPR), but the chances Drake London gets usually score more: 13.3 vs 13.2 expected points a game Est..

2026 season · Weeks 1–6 · Updated Oct 19, 2026

WRATL

Drake London

Fantasy points per game (PPR): 14.7
Expected points per gameEst.: 13.3

6 games with a target, carry or dropback

WRSF

Mike Evans

Fantasy points per game (PPR): 15.3
Expected points per gameEst.: 13.2

5 games with a target, carry or dropback

Week 6 injury report: Questionable (Ribs)

Side by side

Season totals through week 5. Shares are of each player's team totals in the games he played. For counts and shares, the bigger number is in bold and the bars grow from the centre line.

Drake London and Mike Evans, season usage side by side
Stat	Drake London	Mike Evans
Games	6	5
Passes thrown to him
Targets	46	34
Target share	29%	25%
Air-yards share	44%	43%
Catches	31	24
Receiving yards	550	326
Near the end zone
Red-zone chances	2	6
Red-zone share	4%	12%
End-zone targets	2	4
Touchdowns
Touchdowns	0	3
Expected touchdownsEst.	1.5	2.6
Fantasy points
Fantasy points per game (PPR)	14.7	15.3
Fantasy points (PPR)	88.4	76.6
Expected points per gameEst.	13.3	13.2
Points vs expectedEst.	+1.1	+1.8

Week by week

Each bar is one game. Pick a stat to compare.

Target share by week

Out of all the passes his team threw in his games, the part thrown to him.

Drake London
Mike Evans

— no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Target share by week
Week	Drake London	Mike Evans
1	21%against PIT	21%against LA
2	16%against CAR	14%against MIA
3	43%against GB	23%against ARI
4	30%against NO	28%against DEN
5	32%against BAL	37%against SEA
6	30%against CHI	— no game with a target, carry or dropback

Next to each number: that week's opponent. — no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Where they rank

Each player's place among players at his position who meet the leaderboard's minimum. Open a leaderboard for the full list.

Leaderboard ranks for Drake London and Mike Evans
Leaderboard	Drake London	Mike Evans
Target share leaders	#8of 109 wide receivers	#20of 109 wide receivers
Air-yards share leaders	#6of 109 wide receivers	#8of 109 wide receivers
Red-zone share leaders	Below the minimum (at least 3 red-zone opportunities in at least 2 games)	#22of 74 wide receivers
Red-zone opportunity leaders	#81of 187 wide receivers	#25of 187 wide receivers
End-zone target leaders	#46of 187 wide receivers	#23of 187 wide receivers
Expected fantasy points leadersEst.	#26of 187 wide receivers	#29of 187 wide receivers

Talking points

Fact-checked notes from the weekly usage report, with the numbers behind them.

Drake London

Touchdowns below usage

Drake London has scored 0 touchdowns on opportunities that usually produce 1.5, per FFO's expected-points model.

Touchdowns: 0
Expected touchdownsEst.: 1.5
Expected PPR per gameEst.: 13.3
PPR vs expected, per gameEst.: +1.1

Weeks 1–6 · 6 games

Model estimate, not a forecast: v1 predicts about as well as raw points.

Mike Evans

Role up

Mike Evans's target share rose to 37% in week 5 (10 targets), from 22% in weeks 1-4.

Target share, week 5: 37%
Targets, week 5: 10
Target share, weeks 1–4: 22%
Targets, weeks 1–4: 24

Weeks 1–5 · 5 games

Share of team targets/carries in games he played. Snap counts aren't in FFO's licensed data, so a low earlier share can mean limited playing time.

Keep exploring

Drake London

More comparisons

Mike Evans

More comparisons

Compare two other players →