Fantasy FootballOutsiders

Usage comparison · Wide receivers

Drake London vs Justin Jefferson

Drake London gets more of his team's passes (26% vs 25%) and more of the deep throws (37% of its air yards vs 32%). Near the end zone, Justin Jefferson has had more chances (3 vs 0 plays within 20 yards) and a bigger share of his team's chances there (21% vs 0%). Justin Jefferson is scoring more fantasy points a game (15.0 vs 14.3, PPR), but the chances Drake London gets usually score more: 10.3 vs 10.1 expected points a game Est..

2026 season · Weeks 1–4 · Updated Oct 2, 2026

WRATL

Drake London
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
14.3
Expected points per gameEst.
10.3

3 games with a target, carry or dropback

WRMIN

Justin Jefferson
Fantasy points per game (PPR)
15.0
Expected points per gameEst.
10.1

3 games with a target, carry or dropback

Side by side

Season totals through week 3. Shares are of each player's team totals in the games he played. For counts and shares, the bigger number is in bold and the bars grow from the centre line.
Drake London and Justin Jefferson, season usage side by side
StatDrake LondonJustin Jefferson
Games33
Passes thrown to him
Targets1917
Target share26%25%
Air-yards share37%32%
Catches1513
Receiving yards274179
Near the end zone
Red-zone chances03
Red-zone share0%21%
End-zone targets02
Touchdowns
Touchdowns02
Expected touchdownsEst.0.21.0
Fantasy points
Fantasy points per game (PPR)14.315.0
Fantasy points (PPR)42.844.9
Expected points per gameEst.10.310.1
Points vs expectedEst.+4.0+4.2

Week by week

Each bar is one game. Pick a stat to compare.

Target share by week

Out of all the passes his team threw in his games, the part thrown to him.

  • Drake London
  • Justin Jefferson

— no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Target share by week
WeekDrake LondonJustin Jefferson
121%against PIT39%against GB
216%against CAR32%against CHI
343%against GB8%against TB
4— no game with a target, carry or dropback— no game with a target, carry or dropback

Next to each number: that week's opponent. — no game with a target, carry or dropback that week.

Where they rank

Each player's place among players at his position who meet the leaderboard's minimum. Open a leaderboard for the full list.
Leaderboard ranks for Drake London and Justin Jefferson
LeaderboardDrake LondonJustin Jefferson
Target share leaders#11of 76 wide receivers#15of 76 wide receivers
Air-yards share leaders#19of 76 wide receivers#24of 76 wide receivers
Red-zone share leadersBelow the minimum (at least 3 red-zone opportunities in at least 2 games)#4of 36 wide receivers
Red-zone opportunity leaders#122of 166 wide receivers#27of 166 wide receivers
End-zone target leaders#100of 166 wide receivers#29of 166 wide receivers
Expected fantasy points leadersEst.#42of 166 wide receivers#44of 166 wide receivers

Talking points

Fact-checked notes from the weekly usage report, with the numbers behind them.

Drake London

Role up

Drake London's target share rose to 43% in week 3 (10 targets), from 18% in weeks 1-2.

Target share, week 3
43%
Targets, week 3
10
Target share, weeks 1–2
18%
Targets, weeks 1–2
9

Weeks 1–3 · 3 games

  • Share of team targets/carries in games he played. Snap counts aren't in FFO's licensed data, so a low earlier share can mean limited playing time.

Justin Jefferson

No talking points for him in this week's report.

Keep exploring

Drake London

More comparisons

Justin Jefferson

More comparisons

Compare two other players →